2019
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2019.1621872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of feedback on the gender differences in the performance in a chronometric mental-rotation test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For participants' confidence, males reported higher confidence scores than females but only in the condition without feedback. When participants got individual item-wise feedback, no gender differences in confidence appeared (Rahe et al, 2019).In a creativity task, gender differences in confidence did not disappear after positive or negative feedback (McCarty, 1986). Completing a mental-rotation test after manipulated confidence, Estes and Felker (2012) found main effects of gender and confidence but no interaction of both.…”
Section: Effects Of Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For participants' confidence, males reported higher confidence scores than females but only in the condition without feedback. When participants got individual item-wise feedback, no gender differences in confidence appeared (Rahe et al, 2019).In a creativity task, gender differences in confidence did not disappear after positive or negative feedback (McCarty, 1986). Completing a mental-rotation test after manipulated confidence, Estes and Felker (2012) found main effects of gender and confidence but no interaction of both.…”
Section: Effects Of Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In a mental-rotation study comparing participants with and without feedback, main effects of feedback condition for reaction time appeared only for females (Rahe, Ruthsatz, Schuermann, & Quaiser-Pohl, 2019). Females but not males reacted faster in the condition with feedback than without feedback.…”
Section: Effects Of Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Faster RTs were also found in males when compared to females 45 . Yet, when considering the error rates (ERs) gender differences may be more pronounced in some MRts 46 (the ERs can be found in the Supplementary Table S15 – S20 on line).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: MRts of same-different judgement between two stimuli, MRts of left–right judgement with a single stimulus). Such an approach might notably yield a more in-depth knowledge on gender differences, which might be more or less accentuated depending on the MRt type 46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, participants performed better on a harder version of a mental rotation task when they completed an easier version first, suggesting that prior success enhances subsequent performance (Rahe et al, 2019). In children (fourth-graders), Rahe and Quaiser-Pohl (2020) found that feedback enhanced subsequent performance; specifically, reaction times were faster following a feedback condition, although this effect was significant only in boys. More research will be needed to test how prior experiences, including feedback conditions, affect subsequent anxiety in adults and children and whether changes in performance are the result of spatial anxiety per se, given that performance could instead reflect changes in motivation or other psychological factors (e.g., confidence).…”
Section: Gender Differences In Spatial Anxietymentioning
confidence: 95%