2020
DOI: 10.24099/vet.arhiv.1170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of environmental enrichment on some welfare indicators in fattening cattle, housed at different stocking densities

Abstract: The effects of environmental enrichment were assessed at different stocking densities on fattening cattle welfare. The study included four groups of heifers observed during four-month final commercial fattening. The heifers were housed in non-enriched and enriched environments at low (n = 14; 4.5 m2/animal) and high (n = 19; 3.3 m2/animal) stocking density. Environmental enrichment consisted of a grooming brush and salt blocks. Heifer welfare was assessed using selected indicators from the Welfare Quality® ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it was hypothesised that the impact of enrichment on the measures of biological functioning would be small, no significant effect of treatment on faecal cortisol metabolites, body weight, and internal body temperature was found. This is in line with previous studies showing no impact of grooming brush access on the cortisol concentrations (Ishiwata et al, 2006;Matkovićet al, 2020;Park et al, 2020) and weight gain (Ishiwata et al, 2006;Ninomiya, 2019;Park et al, 2020) of cattle. It is possible that the stress induced by weaning masked any potential impacts of enrichment on these biological measures as weaning causes physiological responses such as increased cortisol, protein, and urea concentrations and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in calves, which are reduced with time (Kim et al, 2011;Lynch et al, 2011).…”
Section: Biological Measures (Cortisol Body Weight and Body Temperature)supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although it was hypothesised that the impact of enrichment on the measures of biological functioning would be small, no significant effect of treatment on faecal cortisol metabolites, body weight, and internal body temperature was found. This is in line with previous studies showing no impact of grooming brush access on the cortisol concentrations (Ishiwata et al, 2006;Matkovićet al, 2020;Park et al, 2020) and weight gain (Ishiwata et al, 2006;Ninomiya, 2019;Park et al, 2020) of cattle. It is possible that the stress induced by weaning masked any potential impacts of enrichment on these biological measures as weaning causes physiological responses such as increased cortisol, protein, and urea concentrations and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in calves, which are reduced with time (Kim et al, 2011;Lynch et al, 2011).…”
Section: Biological Measures (Cortisol Body Weight and Body Temperature)supporting
confidence: 93%
“…During weekly observations, an animal could have been repeatedly recorded while exhibiting the same or a different behavior. The results pertaining to the grooming brush and salt blocks usage have been reported previously (Matković et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…No other significant (P > 0.05) intergroup differences in cortisol concentration were recorded (Figure 1). The results obtained could be explained by the more frequent aggressive interactions of heifers in a non-enriched environment also at a lower stocking density (Matković et al, 2020), i.e., with a more room available for their manifestations, thus maintaining the steady cortisol concentrations until the end of fattening in this heifer group (Figure 1). ), whereas the salt blocks have not been widely used in cattle breeding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation