Objective: To determine the role of infant feeding tube (IFT) as a better alternative to DJ stent after uncomplicated ureteroscopic removal of stone. Material and Methods: Between March 2008 to March 2016 a prospective study was done in 1000 patients with a stone in the ureter that underwent surgery. The patients divided into 2 groups, group I included 500 patients who were inserted infant feeding tube after URS, and group II consisted 500 patients who received DJ stent after URS. We removed infant feeding tube within 24 hours and DJ stent after ten days. The outcome of all patients was analysed. Results: Four hundred and eighty patients withstand the IFT well, four patients i.e. 1.6% (three females, one male) complained of pain in the flank, for that DJ stenting was done. While 342 (68.4%) patients with DJ stent returned with irritative symptoms, pain abdomen (25), fever (68), hematuria (12), migration of stent (2), incontinence (4). Conclusion: Patients with IFT after URS develop no stent-related complications as seen with DJ stent they are much better tolerable.KEYWORDS: Infant Feeding Tube, DJ stent, URS, ( DJ stent-double J stent, URS-ureteroscopic removal of stone)
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLEBiswas M, Narang S, Mahajani J, Mahajan R. Infant feeding tube is better option of dj stent for uncomplicated urs: our experience.