2002
DOI: 10.1111/1540-4781.00154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Differential Timing in the Introduction of Japanese Syllabaries on Early Second Language Development in Japanese

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a time lag in the introduction of Japanese syllabaries makes a difference in the early second language acquisition of Japanese. Two groups of native speakers of English, an experimental (lag) group and a control (nonlag) group, participated in this study. The difference between these groups was the amount of time (8 weeks) that elapsed before syllabaries were introduced into their respective Japanese curricula. The 2 groups were equivalent in terms of demogr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the pedagogical assumptions supporting the use of Romaji, such orthographic assistance did not have an impact on beginning-level CALL-based vocabulary learning in Japanese. Hatasa's (2002) study on the classroom use of Romaji provided evidence that confirms this finding. Students who were taught with the prolonged use of Romaji in class did not perform significantly better on their midterm and final exams than those who had an early introduction of authentic Japanese orthography.…”
Section: Effects Of Romajisupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to the pedagogical assumptions supporting the use of Romaji, such orthographic assistance did not have an impact on beginning-level CALL-based vocabulary learning in Japanese. Hatasa's (2002) study on the classroom use of Romaji provided evidence that confirms this finding. Students who were taught with the prolonged use of Romaji in class did not perform significantly better on their midterm and final exams than those who had an early introduction of authentic Japanese orthography.…”
Section: Effects Of Romajisupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In the North American context, Romaji is assumed to be an effective learning aid particularly during the initial period of JFL learning. However, when to switch to the authentic script has been controversial among JFL practitioners (Dewey, 2004;Hatasa, 2002). Those who advocate the early introduction of kana and kanji have pedagogical philosophies quite different from those of the proponents of delayed introduction.…”
Section: Romaji Versus Japanese Scriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, much more research is needed to determine which approach (if either) is most effective. Hatasa's (2002) study, which compares achievement by learners who were introduced to Japanese syllabaries immediately with learners who waited for eight weeks and used romaji showed no significant differences between these delayed and immediate groups. Further similar research involving varied timing and use of romaji, syllabaries, and kanji will help to determine the validity of various beliefs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The lag group did better on tests of phonetic discrimination after one semester, and measures of oral production after one year. A similar study in Japanese (Hatasa, 2002) compared one group that learned the kana scripts immediately, to a group learning Japanese first in romaji and introducing kana scripts eight weeks later. In this study, there was no significant difference in terms of achievement between the groups.…”
Section: Introducing Charactersmentioning
confidence: 99%