2006
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial

Abstract: The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on sentencing and information processing were examined within the context of a murder trial. A sample consisting of 96, jury eligible White Australians read one of four versions of a real trial transcript, in which the race of a male defendant and female victim were varied. The participants imposed the severest sentences on the Indigenous (Black) defendant. Jurors were most lenient with White defendants who killed a White victim. Female jurors were m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
39
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While the race of a victim has been shown to influence sentencing decisions, the current study demonstrates that even with the absence of victim race, African American defendants are significantly more likely to receive more severe sentences. Consistent with previous research, the current study found that participants sentenced Caucasian defendants to less severe alternatives to life without parole (ForsterLee, ForsterLee, Horowitz, and King, 2006;Jordan & Freiburg, 2010;Steffensmeier et al, 1988;Steffensmeier & Demuth, 2006). When charged with the same crime, African American defendants were significantly more likely to receive a sentence of life without parole whereas Caucasian defendants were significantly more likely to be sentenced to 25 years to life.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the race of a victim has been shown to influence sentencing decisions, the current study demonstrates that even with the absence of victim race, African American defendants are significantly more likely to receive more severe sentences. Consistent with previous research, the current study found that participants sentenced Caucasian defendants to less severe alternatives to life without parole (ForsterLee, ForsterLee, Horowitz, and King, 2006;Jordan & Freiburg, 2010;Steffensmeier et al, 1988;Steffensmeier & Demuth, 2006). When charged with the same crime, African American defendants were significantly more likely to receive a sentence of life without parole whereas Caucasian defendants were significantly more likely to be sentenced to 25 years to life.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Moreover, African American defendants convicted of murdering a Caucasian individual are significantly more likely to receive the harshest sentence available compared to any other offender (ForsterLee, ForsterLee, Horowitz, and King, 2006;Steffensmeier et al, 1988;Steffensmeier & Demuth, 2006). While the race of a victim has been shown to influence sentencing decisions, the current study demonstrates that even with the absence of victim race, African American defendants are significantly more likely to receive more severe sentences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Fitzgerald, 2000;Higgins, Heath, Grannemann, 2007;Newcombre y Bransgrove, 2007), la raza (e.g. Abshire y Bornstein, 2003;Brewer, 2004;Force, 2008;ForsterLee, ForsterLee, Horowitz y King, 2006;Sommers y Ellsworth, 2009), la religión (Miller y Bornstein, 2006), el anonimato (e.g. Hazelwood y Brigham, 1998) y la influencia social (Marcus, Lyons y Guyton, 2000), la ideología políti-ca (e. g Najdowski, 2010; Shaw y Skolnick, 2005), y la personalidad (Shetowsky y Horowitz, 2004) de los miembros del jurado entre otras.…”
unclassified
“…Antonio, 2006;Brewer 2004, Forsterlee et al, 2006Mitchell, Haw, Pfeifer, Meissner, 2005) como el sexo (Green, 1961;Mit-chell et.al, 2005;Nagel, 1969), , el estatus socioeconómico (Force, 2008;Rose, Ellison y Diamond, 2008) y la reincidencia (Kalven y Zeisel, 1966, Hogarth, 1971, sin olvidar los estudios sobre la declaración de la víc-tima y características de la misma (Bottoms, Diviak, y Davis 1997;Schuller y Rzepa, 2002;Semmler y Brewer, 2002). En cuanto a las características referentes al proceso de deliberación una de las áreas más estudiadas es la del efecto de los testigos expertos en el proceso de toma de decisión y el procesamiento de dicha información experta (e.g.…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation