1989
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1989.22-407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Consumer Characteristics and Type of Employment Model on Individual Outcomes in Supported Employment

Abstract: Although recent federal legislation has led to a proliferation of supported employment programs throughout the country, little information is available that documents the success of these programs. In the present study, we examined the effect of different consumer characteristics and alternative supported employment service delivery models on key employment outcomes including hourly wage, hours worked per week, increase in earnings after supported employment participation, and level of integration on the job. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wehman demonstrated the feasibility of an individual placement model using job coaches at work sites to train clients to perform job tasks. Within the SE field, individual placement has become the most popular placement strategy, with 79% of placements nationwide falling into this category (Kregel, Wehman, & Banks, 1989;Wehman & Revell, 1996). Moreover, proponents of normalization have argued against mobile work crews and enclaves as violating the spirit of true integration of people with disabilities into mainstream society (Wehman & Moon, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wehman demonstrated the feasibility of an individual placement model using job coaches at work sites to train clients to perform job tasks. Within the SE field, individual placement has become the most popular placement strategy, with 79% of placements nationwide falling into this category (Kregel, Wehman, & Banks, 1989;Wehman & Revell, 1996). Moreover, proponents of normalization have argued against mobile work crews and enclaves as violating the spirit of true integration of people with disabilities into mainstream society (Wehman & Moon, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available evidence indicates that supported employment has had a significant impact on the lives of individuals with significant mental and physical disabilities. Supported employees have realized wage increases of 250% to 500% over their previous earnings (Kregel, Wehman, & Banks, 1989). Face-to-face interviews conducted by Parent and Kregel (1994) and by Petty, Fussell, and Kregel (1994) indicated that individuals with disabilities employed through supported employment programs feel included in the workplace by their supervisors and coworkers.…”
Section: Major Federal Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IQ was chosen as the first predictor variable because of the substantial research literature indicating that individuals with less severe mental retardation are receiving the bulk of supported employment services (Coker, Osgood, & Clouse, 1995;Kregel, Wehman, & Banks, 1989). ABL was chosen as the next variable to be entered into the prediction equation because it is also an indicator of level of mental retardation.…”
Section: Design and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%