2008
DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2008.375.380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Combination of Citric Acid and Microbial Phytase on the Concentration of Some Minerals of Serum and Parameters of Mineralization of Tibia in Commercial Laying Hens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings corresponding to our results were obtained by Nezhad et al (2008) increased after the addition of citric acid. The positive effect of citric acid on the bone crude ash was also found in broilers; however, there was no influence of malic acid or fumaric acid (Liem et al 2008).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Findings corresponding to our results were obtained by Nezhad et al (2008) increased after the addition of citric acid. The positive effect of citric acid on the bone crude ash was also found in broilers; however, there was no influence of malic acid or fumaric acid (Liem et al 2008).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Several studies demonstrated that a reduced intestinal pH by lactic and formic acid as organic acids had a beneficial effect on calcium and phosphorus, and mineral absorption and dietary utilization (26,27). In the present study, laying hens fed on a microencapsulated organic acid blend with MCFAs increased their calcium concentration in the blood serum.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Orban et al (1993) found that the addition of ascorbic acid to the broiler's diet increased the femur breaking strength. The beneficial effect of citric acid on bone (tibia) mineralization has also been observed in laying hens (Nezhad et al, 2008). In our previous experiment, layers fed a diet supplemented with MCFA, SCFA + MCFA or inulin + SCFA displayed a significantly higher bone breaking strength and yielding load in the tibia bone than that of the control group (Świątkiewicz et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%