The effects of childhood maltreatment on epigenetic regulation of stress-response associated genes: an intergenerational approach

Abstract

While biological alterations associated with childhood maltreatment (CM) have been found in affected individuals, it remains unknown to what degree these alterations are biologically transmitted to the next generation. We investigated intergenerational effects of maternal CM on DNA methylation and gene expression in N = 113 mother-infant dyads shortly after parturition, additionally accounting for the role of the FKBP5 rs1360780 genotype. Using mass array spectrometry, we assessed the DNA methylation of selected stress-response-associated genes (FK506 binding protein 51 [FKBP5], glucocorticoid receptor [NR3C1], corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 [CRHR1]) in isolated immune cells from maternal blood and neonatal umbilical cord blood. In mothers, CM was associated with decreased levels of DNA methylation of FKBP5 and CRHR1 and increased NR3C1 methylation, but not with changes in gene expression profiles. Rs1360780 moderated the FKBP5 epigenetic CMassociated regulation profiles in a gene × environment interaction. In newborns, we found no evidence for any intergenerational transmission of CM-related methylation profiles for any of the investigated epigenetic sites. These findings support the hypothesis of a long-lasting impact of CM on the biological epigenetic regulation of stress-response mediators and suggest for the first time that these specific epigenetic patterns might not be directly transmitted to the next generation. Childhood maltreatment (CM) is so far an underestimated global phenomenon present in all societies and social classes. CM comprises experiences of physical, sexual and emotional abuse, as well as physical and emotional neglect during childhood and adolescence and constitutes a major threat to the child's mental and physical development with long-term consequences for both mental and somatic health 1-4. The epigenetic alterations in DNA methylation occurring in the aftermath of CM are pivotal for the adaptation to the early life environment 5 , and can thereby affect gene expression levels 6 and molecular responses to environmental stressors. Epigenetic alterations within key player genes of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, the main coordinator of the physiological stress response (Fig. 1), are discussed to biologically contribute to health consequences observed in CM-affected individuals 7,8. Accordingly, mounting evidence suggests that CM is associated with alterations in DNA methylation within the glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) 9-13 and its regulatory co-chaperone FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP51), which is encoded by the FKBP5 gene 13,14. As depicted in Fig. 1, a balanced regulation between the GR

Prenatal Maternal Stress Causes Preterm Birth and Affects Neonatal Adaptive Immunity in Mice

“…The deleterious consequences of prenatal maternal stress not only affect the first generation of newborns, but also may be transmitted across subsequent generations (24,25). In fact, recent animal studies have shown that gestational stress across generations has downstream effects on the endocrine and metabolic pathways (26,27).…”

The Pathways between Cortisol-Related Regulation Genes and PTSD Psychotherapy

“…TEs can also influence genetic expression through epigenetic mechanisms. Furthermore, exposure to other previous adverse experiences increases the risk of PTSD development [ 13 ], through epigenetic mechanisms [ 8 ]. SNPs can also interact with environmental exposure and epigenetic modifications to increase the risk of PTSD development [ 14 ].…”

Trauma-Informed Care in Primary Health Settings—Which Is Even More Needed in Times of COVID-19

“…The dysregulation of this response can lead to many health problems [9]. Furthermore, adverse childhood experiences (ACEs)-which dysregulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis [10]-are prevalent among primary care patients with chronic conditions and have been found to be positively correlated with the number of clinic visits and time to screen, which means that trauma-informed healthcare has become mandatory [11][12][13]. In this perspective paper, the authors aim to review the most relevant studies which support the hypothesis that trauma-informed healthcare is essential for GPs' clinical practice.…”