2015
DOI: 10.4236/sn.2015.44012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Centrality Ordering in Label Propagation for Community Detection

Abstract: In many cases randomness in community detection algorithms has been avoided due to issues with stability. Indeed replacing random ordering with centrality rankings has improved the performance of some techniques such as Label Propagation Algorithms. This study evaluates the effects of such orderings on the Speaker-listener Label Propagation Algorithm or SLPA, a modification of LPA which has already been stabilized through alternate means. This study demonstrates that in cases where stability has been achieved … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments use the evaluation metrics NMI (Dickinson and Hu, 2015), ARI (Rand, 1971) and modularity Q (Newman, 2006) to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm. (NMI quantifies the similarity between two clusterings by assessing the mutual information shared between them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments use the evaluation metrics NMI (Dickinson and Hu, 2015), ARI (Rand, 1971) and modularity Q (Newman, 2006) to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm. (NMI quantifies the similarity between two clusterings by assessing the mutual information shared between them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community detection algorithms are classified into model-based, local optimized and label propagation algorithms. Numerous problems were reported related to time-efficiency in the first two categories of algorithms and the third is the most cited one i.e., label propagation methods such as LPA [9], SLPA [10,11], BMLPA [12] MLPA [13], DMLPA [14], LabelRank [15], LabelRankT [16] provides properties like low computational complexity, ease of implementation and accuracy in both disjoint and overlapping community detection. The mutual characteristic feature in the label propagation family is the process of exchanging community labels during propagation process between graph nodes in order to send the updated messages to neighbor nodes.…”
Section: Traditional Community Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%