2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpsmen.2015.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of antiepileptic inducers in neuropsychopharmacology, a neglected issue. Part I: A summary of the current state for clinicians

Abstract: Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you.This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 1 The effects of antiepileptic inducers in neuropsychopharmacology, a neglected issue. Part I: A summary of the current state for clinicians. AbstractThe literature on inducers in epilepsy and bipolar disorder is seriously contaminated by false negative findings. This is part I of a comprehens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the median plasma concentration and the dose-adjusted plasma concentration of 9-OH-RIS and AM were about 2-fold lower than in the control group, revealing results that are in line with correction factors for potent inducers, such as CBZ, as suggested by de Leon et al 4,31 The comparison of the plasma and the dose-adjusted plasma concentrations of RIS between the CBZ and the control group did not yield statistically significant differences. However, the numeric difference has to be taken into account, that is, in case of RIS C/D ratio, the median value for CBZ patients was 0.66 (ng/mL)/mg, whereas it was 1.16 (ng/ mL)/mg in the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both the median plasma concentration and the dose-adjusted plasma concentration of 9-OH-RIS and AM were about 2-fold lower than in the control group, revealing results that are in line with correction factors for potent inducers, such as CBZ, as suggested by de Leon et al 4,31 The comparison of the plasma and the dose-adjusted plasma concentrations of RIS between the CBZ and the control group did not yield statistically significant differences. However, the numeric difference has to be taken into account, that is, in case of RIS C/D ratio, the median value for CBZ patients was 0.66 (ng/mL)/mg, whereas it was 1.16 (ng/ mL)/mg in the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…There has been considerable evidence regarding the pharmacokinetic profile of CBZ and especially its DDI with other antiepileptic drugs, illustrating a major inducing effect of CBZ on CYP3A4 as well as similar effects on activities of other CYP isoenzymes, including CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2B6, CYP1A2, UGTs, and P-glycoprotein. 31,36,37 Moreover, Yatham and colleagues 38 detected 40% lower plasma concentrations of RIS AM values in CBZ-treated patients compared with patients receiving RIS and VPA or lithium. These findings are in agreement with data from a small clinical sample reporting a CYP3A4-mediated interaction between CBZ and RIS, leading to decreased plasma levels of the parent compound RIS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Antiepileptic drugs susceptible to this interaction include carbamazepine, clobazam, and others. 36 Modafinil and armodafinil also inhibit CYP2C9/19 37,38 ; this can increase the levels and hence the efficacy (and adverse effects) of antiepileptic drugs metabolized by these enzymes. Susceptible drugs include phenobarbitone, primidone, phenytoin, and others.…”
Section: 34mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Susceptible drugs include phenobarbitone, primidone, phenytoin, and others. 36 Other common antiepileptic drugs such as valproate, lamotrigine, topiramate, gabapentin, and levetiracetam are probably little affected by ar/mod pharmacokinetic interactions.…”
Section: 34mentioning
confidence: 99%