The Effects of Anti-corruption Campaign on Research Grant Reimbursement: Regression Discontinuity Evidence from China

Tang, Li; Cao, Cong; Lien, Donald; Li, Xiaoou

doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00265-7

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, it is also an interesting research direction to further discuss the impact of DI activities on GTFP in different industries or technology types. Second, China has introduced a number of legislative actions to promote the development of DI in recent years, and policy evaluation is also a direction that deserves attention [77][78][79], but is not discussed in this paper. The existing studies have developed some mature research methods for policy evaluation, such as regression discontinuity design [80,81] and difference-in-differences method [82,83].…”

Section: Conclusion and Policy Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Can Digital Innovation Improve Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Digital Patents of China

Rao,

Liu

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Amid intensifying global economic rivalries, China has pinpointed the digital economy and sustainable growth as key accelerators for societal and economic progress. Digital innovation (DI) plays a crucial role in propelling China’s economy towards sustainable growth, by serving as the technological backbone of the digital economy. This study explores how DI influences China’s GTFP through an analysis of panel data covering 30 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions from 2005 to 2021. The results indicate that DI greatly contributes to the enhancement of GTFP. DI can also indirectly promote GTFP by increasing the effectiveness of factor allocation efficiency including capital, labor, and technology. Heterogeneity analysis results indicate that the influence of DI on GTFP differs depending on the degree of intellectual property protection (IPP), the development of digital infrastructure construction (DIC), and the geographical location. A higher degree of IPP and developed DIC make areas better suited for the role of DI in advancing GTFP. Furthermore, in the central and eastern areas, the impact of the digital economy on the promotion of GTFP is particularly noticeable. This study offers reliable empirical evidence for the effect of DI on GTFP and contributes to China’s digital economy and sustainable development.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion and Policy Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Can Digital Innovation Improve Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Digital Patents of China

Rao,

Liu

2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Coordinate and facilitate research integrity officers/champions to promote and create a responsible research culture, including opportunities for an academic integrity framework for policy and practice (including institutional improvements and avoiding the persistence of behaviors detrimental to reproducibility while encouraging responsible research conduct) (19,21,28,43,76,84,98,101,106,110,119,121,127,151,210,235,236,251,255,262,272,277,278,280,285,286,288,294,296,309,311,313,314,318,322,324,(326)(327)(328)(329)(330)(331)345) Support Responsible Research Practices (RRP) as they require facilitation, advice and steer from the Government, funding organisations and academic institutions (progression and progress cannot be done in isolation). Such activity should consider six key areas: research policies; research practices; training researchers; evaluating research(ers); rewarding researchers; funding research(ers)…”

Section: Research Quality and Accountability -Open And Trustworthy Re...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture

Blatch-Jones,

Lakin,

Thomas

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The crisis in research culture is well documented, covering issues such as a tendency for quantity over quality, unhealthy competitive environments, and assessment based on publications, journal prestige and funding. In response, research institutions need to assess their own practices to promote and advocate for change in the current research ecosystem. The purpose of the scoping review was to explore ‘What does the evidence say about the ‘problem’ with ‘poor’ research culture, what are the benefits of ‘good’ research culture, and what does ‘good’ look like?’ Aims: To examine the peer-reviewed and grey literature to explore the interplay between research culture, open research, career paths, recognition and rewards, and equality, diversity, and inclusion, as part of a larger programme of activity for a research institution.Methods: A scoping review was undertaken. Six databases were searched along with grey literature. Eligible literature had relevance to academic research institutions, addressed research culture, and were published between January 2017 to May 2022. Evidence was mapped and themed to specific categories. The search strategy, screening and analysis took place between April-May 2022. Results: 1666 titles and abstracts, and 924 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 253 articles met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. A purposive sampling of relevant websites was drawn from to complement the review, resulting in 102 records included in the review. Key areas for consideration were identified across the four themes of job security, wellbeing and equality of opportunity, teamwork and interdisciplinary, and research quality and accountability. Conclusions: There are opportunities for research institutions to improve their own practice, however institutional solutions cannot act in isolation. Research institutions and research funders need to work together to build a more sustainable and inclusive research culture that is diverse in nature and supports individuals’ well-being, career progression and performance.

show abstract

A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture

Blatch-Jones,

Lakin,

Thomas

2024

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The crisis in research culture is well documented, covering issues such as a tendency for quantity over quality, unhealthy competitive environments, and assessment based on publications, journal prestige and funding. In response, research institutions need to assess their own practices to promote and advocate for change in the current research ecosystem. The purpose of the scoping review was to explore ‘What does the evidence say about the ‘problem’ with ‘poor’ research culture, what are the benefits of ‘good’ research culture, and what does ‘good’ look like?’ Aims To examine the peer-reviewed and grey literature to explore the interplay between research culture, open research, career paths, recognition and rewards, and equality, diversity, and inclusion, as part of a larger programme of activity for a research institution. Methods A scoping review was undertaken. Six databases were searched along with grey literature. Eligible literature had relevance to academic research institutions, addressed research culture, and were published between January 2017 to May 2022. Evidence was mapped and themed to specific categories. The search strategy, screening and analysis took place between April-May 2022. Results 1666 titles and abstracts, and 924 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 253 articles met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. A purposive sampling of relevant websites was drawn from to complement the review, resulting in 102 records included in the review. Key areas for consideration were identified across the four themes of job security, wellbeing and equality of opportunity, teamwork and interdisciplinary, and research quality and accountability. Conclusions There are opportunities for research institutions to improve their own practice, however institutional solutions cannot act in isolation. Research institutions and research funders need to work together to build a more sustainable and inclusive research culture that is diverse in nature and supports individuals’ well-being, career progression and performance.

show abstract

The Effects of Anti-corruption Campaign on Research Grant Reimbursement: Regression Discontinuity Evidence from China

Cited by 5 publications

References 54 publications

Can Digital Innovation Improve Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Digital Patents of China

Can Digital Innovation Improve Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Digital Patents of China

A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture

A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About