Studies in Dyadic Communication 1972
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-015867-9.50007-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Ambiguity and Anxiety On Interviewee Verbal Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, pauses were more frequent in the face-to-face condition in one study (Williams, 1978), longer in the nonvisibility condition of another (Argyle et af., 1968) and of equal length in both conditions in a third (Rutter and Stephenson, 1977). Filled pauses were more frequent in the nonvisibility condition of two studies (Kasl and Mahl, 1965;Siegman and Pope, 1972) and equally frequent in both conditions of a third one (Rutter and Stephenson, 1977). Finally, Rutter and Stephenson (1 977) recorded more speech disturbances in their nonvisibility condition than in the face-to-face condition, which is in accordance with the above formulated prediction.…”
Section: Synchronizing and Interaction Regulationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Indeed, pauses were more frequent in the face-to-face condition in one study (Williams, 1978), longer in the nonvisibility condition of another (Argyle et af., 1968) and of equal length in both conditions in a third (Rutter and Stephenson, 1977). Filled pauses were more frequent in the nonvisibility condition of two studies (Kasl and Mahl, 1965;Siegman and Pope, 1972) and equally frequent in both conditions of a third one (Rutter and Stephenson, 1977). Finally, Rutter and Stephenson (1 977) recorded more speech disturbances in their nonvisibility condition than in the face-to-face condition, which is in accordance with the above formulated prediction.…”
Section: Synchronizing and Interaction Regulationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Kasl and Mahl (1965), in an experiment concerned mainly with possible relationships between anxiety and speech disturbance and filled pausing, noted that, when subjects spoke to the experimenter at times when he was out of the room, they used proportionately more 'ers' and 'ums' than when he was in the room and visual communication could occur. Siegman and Pope (1972) reported a similar finding, and Moscovici and Plon (1966) also noted structural differences in speech. Subjects asked to converse back-to-back spoke in a more formal style than those who met face-to-face, using a higher ratio of nouns and connectives to verbs, as in written language.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Speech rate and pauses seem to be strongly affected by virtually all emotional states (Pittam & Scherer, 1993;Siegman, 1987b), including trait anxiety and state anxiety (generally, speech pauses show a negative correlation to trait anxiety and a positive correlation to state anxiety, e.g., Kasl & Mahl, 1965;Siegman & Pope, 1972), as well as sad or depressed states (see above). As depression is characterized by habitual states of sadness and anxiety, one would expect to see the respective emotional speech rate changes in depression.…”
Section: Temporal Aspects Of Speech and Depressionmentioning
confidence: 96%