2015
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of adding single-joint exercises to a multi-joint exercise resistance training program on upper body muscle strength and size in trained men

Abstract: The aim of this study was compare changes in upper body muscle strength and size in trained men performing resistance training (RT) programs involving multi-joint plus single-joint (MJ+SJ) or only multi-joint (MJ) exercises. Twenty young men with at least 2 years of experience in RT were randomized in 2 groups: MJ+SJ (n = 10; age, 27.7 ± 6.6 years) and MJ (n = 10; age, 29.4 ± 4.6 years). Both groups trained for 8 weeks following a linear periodization model. Measures of elbow flexors and extensors 1-repetition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
51
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(5 reference statements)
5
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding, it is important to note that previous studies in untrained participants reported no advantages in SJ over MJ exercises for producing increases in elbow flexor muscle size and strength . In addition, studies in trained and untrained people consistently showed that the addition of SJ exercises to a MJ training program does not result in additional gains in muscle strength and size in the arm muscles …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notwithstanding, it is important to note that previous studies in untrained participants reported no advantages in SJ over MJ exercises for producing increases in elbow flexor muscle size and strength . In addition, studies in trained and untrained people consistently showed that the addition of SJ exercises to a MJ training program does not result in additional gains in muscle strength and size in the arm muscles …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Contrary to this hypothesis, previous studies reported that SJ exercises offer no benefit over MJ exercises in gains of muscle strength and size . Moreover, other studies reported that the addition of SJ exercises to a session composed of MJ exercises did not alter the gains in muscle size and strength in either untrained or trained subjects . However, it is important to note that these studies were of relatively short duration (<12 weeks), and that the cumulative effects of either suboptimal or excessive stimuli are unlikely to be manifested in such a short period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…57 Moreover, other studies showed that the addition of single-joint exercises did not increase the gains in muscle size and strength in untrained 58 or trained subjects. 59 A counterpoint to this argument can be made with the study of Soares et al 60 in which upper limb muscles recovered faster after seated rows than during isolated elbow flexions. Probably, the difference may be related to the exercise used, since the ratio of activation of latissimus dorsi to biceps during seated rows is higher than during lat pull-downs, 61 which could have led to lower elbow flexor damage in the study of Soares et al 60 Considering that testosterone increases muscle recovery, 62 protein synthesis 63 and satellite cell activity, 64 , 65 the accretion of isolated exercises would have difficulty in inducing a state of overtraining in bodybuilders using anabolic steroids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of multi-joint exercises can save time and decrease the number of exercises, which equates to training volume. Nonetheless, the addition of single-joint exercises failed to promote gains in muscle and strength of both trained [26] and untrained participants [27]. Hence, it is possible save time and prevent adverse training effects (e.g., injury and overtraining) by restricting the use of single-joint exercises [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%