1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7894(82)80062-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of a peer-modeling film on children learning to self-inject insulin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ward (1984) supports the view that they provide by far the most efficient means of dissemination of facts to children/carers. However, a peer‐modelling film used to teach self‐injection technique was effective for 8–9‐year‐old girls, but not for younger children of either sex (Gilbert et al . 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ward (1984) supports the view that they provide by far the most efficient means of dissemination of facts to children/carers. However, a peer‐modelling film used to teach self‐injection technique was effective for 8–9‐year‐old girls, but not for younger children of either sex (Gilbert et al . 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Younger children exhibited significantly more distress than did older children. A few small studies support behavioral interventions for improving older children's self‐injection of insulin , but there are no studies of parent training to promote tolerance of insulin injections among YC‐T1D. Further, we could find no studies of YC‐T1D or their parents regarding tolerance of insertions of either insulin pump infusion sets or continuous glucose sensors.…”
Section: Individual Child Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Others have shown that diabetes knowledge and skill levels increase with age, but these studies have not yielded clinically practical guidelines (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). These studies revealed correlations between age and specific IDDM knowledge or skills ranging from 0.45 to 0.75, suggesting that age is an imperfect marker of IDDM self-care autonomy and that other dimensions of psychological maturity require consideration in clinical and educational management of childhood diabetes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%