The effectiveness of using blended learning teaching and learning strategy to develop students' performance at higher education

Abstract

PurposeThe research aims to identify the effectiveness of using the blended learning strategy on achievement among students of higher colleges of technology in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), through the answer to the following question: Is there a statistically significant difference at the significance level (a = 0.05) in students' achievements in general studies courses at higher education attributed to the method of teaching (blended learning, traditional).Design/methodology/approachThe research applied a Quasi-experimental. The current research used two groups experimental group and controlled group across two phases: pilot study and experimental study. Phase 1 examined the difference between the pilot group and the nonpilot group at Sharjah colleges across three different courses: Fundamentals of Applied Mathematics, Professional Communication and Reporting and Basic Research Methods during the spring semester 2019 at Sharjah colleges. Phase 2 examined the difference between the experimental group (using blended learning during summer 2019) and the controlled group (learned the same courses during summer 2018) across three different courses and the same three courses.FindingsThere is no statistically significant difference at significance level (a = 0.05) in students' achievements in the Fundamentals of Applied Mathematics (LSM 1000) course between the experimental and controlled groups. There is a statistically significant difference at significance level (a = 0.05) in students' achievements in the Professional Communication and Reporting (LSC 1103) in favor of the experimental group course at higher education attributed to the method of teaching (blended learning, traditional). There is no statistically significant difference at significance level (a = 0.05) in students' achievements in the Basic Research Methods (LSS 1123) between the experimental and controlled groups.Research limitations/implications1. The study is limited to students of Higher Colleges of Technology in the UAE. 2. The study is limited to the General Studies Department at Higher Colleges of Technology. 3. The achievement test used in the study is a standardized test developed by the college.Originality/valueThis research considered the first research to discuss the effectiveness of using blended learning where three teaching strategies are combined together (normal face-to-face classes, flipped classroom and online face-to-face classes) in students' achievement at higher education in the UAE.

Blended learning for the “multi-track” undergraduate students in Ghana in an adverse era

“…Blended learning results in better academic outcomes for learners and increases engagement [ 6 , 36 ]. A blended learning approach facilitates equipping learners with skills to continue their education, helps them to self-diagnose their educational needs, and searches for appropriate educational resources while at the same time providing customization and flexibility in learning [10] . In the event of climate-related natural disasters or disruptive situations such as the COVID-19, blended learning allows the continuity of education [6] .…”

Developing a Blended Learning Model in Islamic Religious Education to Improve Learning Outcomes

“…Kang et al [27] verify a flipped classroom on knowledge, problem-solving, and satisfaction student in designing BL. Ayob et al [28] identify the effectiveness of using the strategy of BL toward higher students in the United Arab Emirates. Shantini et al [29] found several factors that influence the implementation.…”

Effectiveness of training program by blended learning on knowledge and practices regarding first aid among preparatory year engineering students at Assiut University

“…The results indicated a statistically significant difference between the mean scores in which the experimental group receiving blended learning delivery outperformed the control group in an achievement test. 15 Blended learning was adopted in this study because it increased learner acceptance, improved learner engagement and motivation, reduced training expenses, and reached more learners who may have some control over some aspects of their learning such as time, location, and path. It also boosts student retention and dedication to their educational goals.…”