2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2987-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of treatment for Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) delivered by community health workers compared to a traditional facility based model

Abstract: BackgroundIn most health systems, Community Health Workers (CHWs) identify and screen for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in the community. This study aimed to investigate the potential of integrating SAM identification and treatment delivered by CHWs, in order to improve the coverage of SAM treatment services.MethodsThis multicentre, randomised intervention study was conducted in Kita, Southwest Mali between February 2015 and February 2016. Treatment for uncomplicated SAM was provided in health facilities in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the other area, the iCCM+ protocol was applied; in addition to HFs, treatment by CHWs close to the households was added (intervention group: 3 HFs + 17 CHWs). The results of the coverage and effectiveness of this combined outpatient treatment model with medical staff at HFs plus CHWs at the household level have been previously published elsewhere [16]. According to Malian protocols, CHWs previously received two weeks of training from health staff on iCCM and CMAM techniques, with one month of on-site practice at the HF.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the other area, the iCCM+ protocol was applied; in addition to HFs, treatment by CHWs close to the households was added (intervention group: 3 HFs + 17 CHWs). The results of the coverage and effectiveness of this combined outpatient treatment model with medical staff at HFs plus CHWs at the household level have been previously published elsewhere [16]. According to Malian protocols, CHWs previously received two weeks of training from health staff on iCCM and CMAM techniques, with one month of on-site practice at the HF.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a year, the coverage of SAM treatment achieved in the intervention group (treatment delivered at the health facilities with CHWs) was 86.7% compared with 43.9% in the control group during the same period ( P < 0.001). These results show that when CHWs offer SAM treatment, more children access health services (Álvarez‐Morán, Alé, Charle, et al, ). In Angola, coverage was estimated to be 82.1% in those areas where CHWs were active.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The cure rate achieved in the control group (children treated at health facilities without any CHW delivering treatment) was 88.6%. In comparison, the probability of being cured in the intervention model was higher after adjusting for sex, oedema, and MUAC at admission (risk ratio: 1.89; 95% confidence interval [1.09, 3.27], P = 0.022; Álvarez‐Morán Alé, Charle, et al, ). The projects in Angola, Malawi, and Bangladesh also achieved cure rates above 90% of children enrolled.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations