2012
DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2012.728122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effectiveness of Training to Improve Person Perception Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results align with theories on the deleterious effects of experience, supporting our hypothesis that this extends to the formation of first impressions of CEOs' leadership ability from nonverbal cues. Although training with proper practice and feedback can improve the accuracy of interpersonal perception (Blanch-Hartigan et al 2012), small samples of experience or knowledge can inhibit it (Crow 1957). Previous work has demonstrated that experience in a particular domain leads individuals to make judgments based on abstract or unrelated knowledge, whereas those without experience base impressions on more obvious characteristics (e.g., Chi et al 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These results align with theories on the deleterious effects of experience, supporting our hypothesis that this extends to the formation of first impressions of CEOs' leadership ability from nonverbal cues. Although training with proper practice and feedback can improve the accuracy of interpersonal perception (Blanch-Hartigan et al 2012), small samples of experience or knowledge can inhibit it (Crow 1957). Previous work has demonstrated that experience in a particular domain leads individuals to make judgments based on abstract or unrelated knowledge, whereas those without experience base impressions on more obvious characteristics (e.g., Chi et al 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Person perception studies have shown that training in deception detection can improve a person's accuracy in spotting lies (e.g., Porter et al 2000). Training and feedback are also required to internalize relevant cues that modify the formation of first impressions and improve accuracy (Blanch-Hartigan et al 2012). Previous meta-analyses have found that feedback moderately improves deception detection (Hedge's g = 0.19; Hauch et al 2014), and that feedback across a range of domains can substantially affect performance (Cohen's d = 0.41, Kluger and DeNisi 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pain assessment accuracy is a skill amenable to training [81,82]. Short trainings focused on nonverbal facial expressions of pain have shown promise in improving pain assessment accuracy in non-clinical settings [83][84][85].…”
Section: Training To Improve Pain Assessment Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%