2014
DOI: 10.1080/00344893.2014.951229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effectiveness of Quotas: Vertical and Horizontal Discrimination in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. Quotas may also be applied in a binding manner, as in political institutions. There is some evidence that gender quotas have a positive effect on the number of women elected (Oñate, 2014) and on parties' attention to social justice issues (Catalano Weeks, 2019). …”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Quotas may also be applied in a binding manner, as in political institutions. There is some evidence that gender quotas have a positive effect on the number of women elected (Oñate, 2014) and on parties' attention to social justice issues (Catalano Weeks, 2019). …”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the share o women in political institutions, the literature has linked their higher or lower presence to three categories o actors: institutional (Kittilson 2006;Oñate 2014;Wängnerud 2009), such as electoral rules, how parties organise candidate selection or gender quotas; socioeconomic (Iversen and Rosenbluth 2008;Rosenbluth, Salmond, and Thies 2006), such as the proportion o women in the workorce and the strength o the welare state; and cultural or contextual (Dahlerup and Leyenaar 2013;Sundström and Stockemer 2015), like modernisation trends, belies about equality and the social acceptance o women or representational and leadership roles. For our purposes, we propose to analyze institutional and contextual variables rst, ollowed by individual and socioeconomic elements.…”
Section: Who and How Are They? Descriptive Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have identified three categories of factors that explain varying levels of women's participation in political office: institutional (Duverger, 1955;Kittilson, 2006;Wangnerud, 2009;Oñate, 2014) such as electoral rules, how parties organize candidate selection or gender quotas; socioeconomic (Rosembluth et al, 2006;Iversen and Rosembluth, 2008) such as the proportion of women in the workforce and the strength of the welfare state; and cultural (Dalherup and Leyennard, 2013) such as modernization trends, beliefs about equality, and the social acceptance of women for representational and leadership roles. The have also found that, other things being equal, leftist parties have traditionally been more likely to nominate women to safe places on their lists, although party ideology seems not to matter as much nowadays as it did in the past (Kittilson, 2013).…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%