1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00021155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of early generation (F3) yield testing and the single seed descent procedures in two cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) crosses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average effect of the parental lines and the additive effects were the most important components, suggesting that the increase in mineral values can be obtained through methods of genealogical improvement and "single pod descent", the most commonly applied breeding methods in autogamous plants such as cowpea (Ntare et al, 1984). The crossing of divergent parents with high mineral content is also recommended because the average effect of the parental lines contributes significantly to the gene expression models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average effect of the parental lines and the additive effects were the most important components, suggesting that the increase in mineral values can be obtained through methods of genealogical improvement and "single pod descent", the most commonly applied breeding methods in autogamous plants such as cowpea (Ntare et al, 1984). The crossing of divergent parents with high mineral content is also recommended because the average effect of the parental lines contributes significantly to the gene expression models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in general, all three breeding methods are similarly effective in cowpea improvement. Ntare et al (1984), using two crosses of cowpea early generation selection at F3 level, reported that the PM, SSD and MB were comparable in cowpea improvement. They also reported that the grain yields of lines derived by the SSD procedure were as good as those derived from early selection.…”
Section: Comparison Among Breeding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Различия по урожайности между линиями F3 сохраняются и в более поздних поколениях (r = 0,51 -0,85). (Ntare et al, 1984) Косвенный отбор по урожайности на основе биомассы в совокупности с Кхоз был более эффективен в увеличении урожайности овса, чем прямой отбор по урожайности. (Helsel, 1985) Наибольшее количество самых урожайных линий F4 было получено в варианте визуального отбора и в варианте отбора по массе 1000 зёрен в сравнении со случайным отбором.…”
Section: таблица 1 главные выводы работ по прямому или косвенному отunclassified