1996
DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(96)00001-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of cross-cultural training for expatriates: An assessment of the literature on the issue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
186
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
186
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the antecedents and consequences of expatriate adjustment have been well documented (see Bhaskar-Shrinivas, Harrison, Shaffer, & Luk, 2005;Hechanova, Beehr, & Christiansen, 2003, for meta-analytic reviews), many authors within the expatriate management literature have lamented the unavailability of job performance criteria for expatriates (see, e.g., Arthur & Bennett, 1995Hawes & Kealey, 1979;Kealey & Protheroe, 1996;Mol, Born, & Van der Molen, 2003;Ones & Viswesvaran, 1997;Sinangil & Ones, 2001;Werner, 2002).…”
Section: Journal Of Cross-culturalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the antecedents and consequences of expatriate adjustment have been well documented (see Bhaskar-Shrinivas, Harrison, Shaffer, & Luk, 2005;Hechanova, Beehr, & Christiansen, 2003, for meta-analytic reviews), many authors within the expatriate management literature have lamented the unavailability of job performance criteria for expatriates (see, e.g., Arthur & Bennett, 1995Hawes & Kealey, 1979;Kealey & Protheroe, 1996;Mol, Born, & Van der Molen, 2003;Ones & Viswesvaran, 1997;Sinangil & Ones, 2001;Werner, 2002).…”
Section: Journal Of Cross-culturalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, Arthur and Bennett (1995) note that more than five decades of research on expatriate selection has failed to yield a clear and explicit knowledge structure of what it is we should be training and selecting for. Evidence for different schools of thought may be found in the fact that some researchers seek an answer to this criterion issue in the expatriate's adjustment (e.g., Black, 1990), whereas others (e.g., Dalton & Wilson, 2000) emphasize the expatriate's job performance as the criterion of choice.Although the antecedents and consequences of expatriate adjustment have been well documented (see Bhaskar-Shrinivas, Harrison, Shaffer, & Luk, 2005;Hechanova, Beehr, & Christiansen, 2003, for meta-analytic reviews), many authors within the expatriate management literature have lamented the unavailability of job performance criteria for expatriates (see, e.g., Arthur & Bennett, 1995Hawes & Kealey, 1979;Kealey & Protheroe, 1996;Mol, Born, & Van der Molen, 2003;Ones & Viswesvaran, 1997;Sinangil & Ones, 2001;Werner, 2002).Nevertheless, there has recently been an increase in empirical publications vis-à-vis expatriate job performance. This is affirmed by two meta-analytic publications about the relationship between training and expatriate job performance (see Deshpande & Viswesvaran, 1992;Morris & Robie, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kealey has done significant work on overseas effectiveness, which he defines as the ability to live and work effectively in the cross-cultural setting of an overseas assignment. 7,8 Attempts also have been made to gain insight into human resource management in humanitarian assistance through large-scale surveys, but this research has disclosed little about the volunteers themselves. 6,9,10 A few limited studies by Anderson and Moore 11 and Liao-Troth and Dunn 12 have looked at motivations among volunteers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are a number of valid research approaches, we deemed a quantitative, survey-based methodology appropriate since it allows minimizing the subjectivity in the analysis of the data by employing statistical tests to examine the validity of the research hypotheses (Kealey and Protheroe 1996). Moreover, by using a survey, we can investigate the perceptions and intentions of a large number of subjects (i.e., organizations), which may not be practical with qualitative methods.…”
Section: Study Design and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%