1997
DOI: 10.1300/j025v13n03_04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Academic Achievement of Secondary Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported that their meta-analysis showed that CAI is an effective intervention for improving students' academic achievement. Christmann, Lucking, & Badgett (1997) also contended that the result of their meta-analysis study lends support to the assumption that CAI effects vary among the different subject areas. For example, "it appears to have its strongest effect among science students; whereas its effects are weaker in mathematics, and weakest in the area of English" (p. 292).…”
Section: What Evidence Exists That the Promising Practice Has Resultementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They reported that their meta-analysis showed that CAI is an effective intervention for improving students' academic achievement. Christmann, Lucking, & Badgett (1997) also contended that the result of their meta-analysis study lends support to the assumption that CAI effects vary among the different subject areas. For example, "it appears to have its strongest effect among science students; whereas its effects are weaker in mathematics, and weakest in the area of English" (p. 292).…”
Section: What Evidence Exists That the Promising Practice Has Resultementioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example: In a meta-analysis study, Christmann, Badgett, and Lucking (1997) compared the academic achievement of students in Grades 6 through 12 who received traditional instruction or traditional instruction supplemented with computer-assisted instruction (CAI) across eight curricular areas. From the 42 conclusions, they found an overall mean effect size of 0.21, indicating that on average, students receiving traditional instruction supplemented with CAI attained higher academic achievement than did the 58.2% of those receiving only traditional instruction.…”
Section: What Evidence Exists That the Promising Practice Has Resultementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAI includes more advanced hardware and software technology, and allows for greater student interaction, and greater stores of information (Christmann, Badgett, & Lucking, 1997). There are many programs available that can assist students' education, such as discrete educational software (DES), integrated learning systems (ILS), computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and computer-based instruction (CBI) (Murphy et al, 2002).…”
Section: Purpose Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%