International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large-Scale Studies and Quantitative Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, meta‐analysis studies (Liao & Hao 2008) can be carried out on all the ICT4E programmes once they have been disseminated in order to analyse the effectiveness of ICT developed in this way in a particular education system. These studies will complement large‐scale and generic studies about the impact of ICT in the school system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, meta‐analysis studies (Liao & Hao 2008) can be carried out on all the ICT4E programmes once they have been disseminated in order to analyse the effectiveness of ICT developed in this way in a particular education system. These studies will complement large‐scale and generic studies about the impact of ICT in the school system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2006; OECD 2006, 2010). Meta‐analysis studies also reflect this contradictory reality (Kulik 2003; Liao & Hao 2008). From this point onwards, we will refer to any improvement in students' attainment simply as an ‘impact’ (Trucano 2005; Cox & Marshall 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large‐scale international studies, such as those conducted by Pelgrum and Plomp (2008), which use the same instruments for all country participants and meta‐studies (e.g. Liao & Hao 2008), therefore involve methods that provide results that can be generalized for the common variables being investigated. However, such studies cannot always take account of the local and national variables, such as whether or not the country's national curriculum requires the teachers to use e‐learning, and therefore the uptake might be higher than where it is an optional extra; or how teachers and schools and the national researchers interpret the meaning of e‐learning, and what kinds of e‐learning use is taking place informally.…”
Section: Quantitative Versus Qualitative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In identifying which technologies to use and how to deploy them it is difficult to establish clear criteria based on evidence because meta-analyses of effect sizes shows much variation and no clear patterns with regard to the value of different ICTs (Hattie 2009;Liao and Hao 2008). Instead these analyses confirmed those of other studies that the value of the use of particular ICTs depends on the specific learning intentions, characteristics of learners and how the ICT resources were deployed alongside other elements of the learning environment.…”
Section: Learning Without Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%