2015
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effectiveness of 4 Weeks of Fundamental Movement Training on Functional Movement Screen and Physiological Performance in Physically Active Children

Abstract: The effectiveness of fundamental movement training interventions in adolescents is not fully understood. The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) may provide means of evaluating the effectiveness of such programs alongside traditional tests of physiological performance. Twenty-two children completed the FMS, plank, side plank, sit and reach, and multistage fitness test. Participants were pair matched by total FMS score and assigned to control or intervention. The intervention group received a weekly 4 × 30-minute … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Studies investigating the effectiveness of the FMS to monitor training intervention have been conducted. 35,[45][46][47] al. 46 performed the first controlled trail using FMS to assess movement competency in secondary school children.…”
Section: Modifiabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 Studies investigating the effectiveness of the FMS to monitor training intervention have been conducted. 35,[45][46][47] al. 46 performed the first controlled trail using FMS to assess movement competency in secondary school children.…”
Section: Modifiabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,[45][46][47] al. 46 performed the first controlled trail using FMS to assess movement competency in secondary school children. However, the results of this study disagreed with the assumption that the performance on the FMS can be modified, as the four week training intervention made little impact on the total FMS score.…”
Section: Modifiabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, the authors have utilized elements of the Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS™) and dynamic jump assessments such as Drop Jump (22) and Tuck Jump (39) to assess movement skills and provide a basis for programming. However, a clear maturation effect is present in the FMS™ (31) and its sensitivity to assess change in youth populations has been questioned (61). Therefore, we propose an alternative approach to assess movement competence through a curriculum (Table 1).…”
Section: Neuromuscular Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practitioners should also be cautious when interpreting scores on mobility based tests without analyzing the quality of the movement, as high scores may be achieved in the presence of hypermobility which may be a risk factor for certain injuries (58). Both inter and intra-rater reliability has been established in youth populations (73), but to the knowledge of the authors no research has been conducted which a) validates FMS total score as an injury predictor or b) reports inter-session reliability. Therefore, practitioners should consider the above limitations when screening their young athletes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%