2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2009.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effective convectivity model for simulation of melt pool heat transfer in a light water reactor pressure vessel lower head. Part II: Model assessment and application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results show that for a debris bed (melt pool) less than 0.7 m thick formed in the lower plenum, the CRGT cooling at the nominal water flow rate is sufficient for removing the decay heat and thus is likely adequate to ensure the integrity of the reactor pressure vessel. With a thicker debris bed, the vessel wall is predicted to fail in the section close to the uppermost region of debris bed (melt pool) [76]. The simulation with a metal layer shows that in a stratified melt pool (0.2 m metal layer in 1.0 m total thickness) the focusing effect is ameliorated, thanks to the CRGT cooling.…”
Section: In-vessel Melt/debris Coolabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation results show that for a debris bed (melt pool) less than 0.7 m thick formed in the lower plenum, the CRGT cooling at the nominal water flow rate is sufficient for removing the decay heat and thus is likely adequate to ensure the integrity of the reactor pressure vessel. With a thicker debris bed, the vessel wall is predicted to fail in the section close to the uppermost region of debris bed (melt pool) [76]. The simulation with a metal layer shows that in a stratified melt pool (0.2 m metal layer in 1.0 m total thickness) the focusing effect is ameliorated, thanks to the CRGT cooling.…”
Section: In-vessel Melt/debris Coolabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An extensive study on the efficiency of CRGT cooling as a SAM measure has been conducted at the Royal Institute of Technology [75] [76] [77] [78]. Figure 2.33 shows a conceptual configuration of corium pool in a BWR lower head with CRGT cooling and top flooding.…”
Section: In-vessel Melt/debris Coolabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang, Mingjun et al performed three-dimensional CFD simulations with three types of internal structures in the lower plenum, and the influence of different internal structures on the flow characteristics in the lower plenum was achieved and analyzed [7]. TRAN C T developed the ECM capability to accurately predict energy splitting and heat flux profiles in volumetrically heated liquid pools of different geometries over a range of conditions related to accident progression, examined and benchmarked against both experimental data and CFD results [8]. Maatki, Chemseddine et al numerically performed the entropy generation of double diffusive natural convection in a three-dimensional differentially heated enclosure [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Right from the first, the severe accident codes have greatly contributed to analysis of IVR strategy. Since the analytical methods [7,8] and numerical methods [9,10,11] require initial bounding conditions which mostly provided by severe accident analysis codes such as RELAP5/SCDAP and MELCOR code, in order to evaluate the thermal response of lower head wall under heat load from molten pool. The RELAP5/SCDAP was used to provide bounding conditions including mass of molten debris and its components, temperature, and decay heat deposited in molten debris in an extensive series of severe accident calculations for AP1000 [4] and APR1400 [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%