1992
DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.46-0348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effective Charge Number and Diffusion Coefficient of Cationic Cytochrome c in Aqueous Solution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the D p values obtained using both models are collected in Table 5. All coefficients are much lower than that of unsupported cyt c in aqueous solution (2 10 -6 cm 2 s -1 at 30 ºC and 100 mM ionic strength) [45]. The information of the two models is quite different.…”
Section: Immobilisation Of Cytochrome C On the Carbon Xerogelsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Results of the D p values obtained using both models are collected in Table 5. All coefficients are much lower than that of unsupported cyt c in aqueous solution (2 10 -6 cm 2 s -1 at 30 ºC and 100 mM ionic strength) [45]. The information of the two models is quite different.…”
Section: Immobilisation Of Cytochrome C On the Carbon Xerogelsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The way in which this influences the voltammetric response depends on the stereochemistry of interaction and the conformation necessary for electron transfer to take place. Some investigations on this theme have been undertaken [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. In particular, it has been stated that conformation and effective charge can be influenced by the temperature [8 -10]; it has also been found that deterioration of cytochrome c is faster the higher the temperature [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed further clearance studies with a two‐membrane chip, which increases clearance and helps to accurately measure values for molecules with smaller diffusion coefficients like vitamin B12, cytochrome c and insulin. The results are shown in Figure b where it is shown that as the diffusion coefficient decreases, so does the clearance with FITC‐insulin ( D = 8.2 × 10 −7 cm 2 s −1 ) clearing more slowly than cytochrome c ( D = 1.63 × 10 −6 cm 2 s −1 ) . Albumin clearance studies were also performed with nonporous membranes and the results showed that the outlet concentration matched that of the inlet indicating that no albumin was lost to the system (e.g., by adsorption).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The results are shown in Figure 3b where it is shown that as the diffusion coefficient decreases, so does the clearance with FITC-insulin (D = 8.2 × 10 −7 cm 2 s −1 ) [25] clearing more slowly than cytochrome c (D = 1.63 × 10 −6 cm 2 s −1 ). [26] Albumin clearance studies were also performed with nonporous membranes and the results showed that the outlet concentration matched that of the inlet indicating that no albumin was lost to the system (e.g., by adsorption).…”
Section: Characterization Of Solute Clearance By 75 Nm Npn-omentioning
confidence: 99%