1962
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(62)90313-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of visible radiation on the functional life-span of mammalian and avian spermatozoa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shorter wavelengths of visible light are detrimental to the mobility of bovine spermatozoa (Norman and Goldberg, 1959;Van Duijn, 1961;Norman et al, 1962;Foote, 1967) and similarly, "visible" light immobilized sea urchin sperm (Wells and Giese, 1950). In all of these reports, the production of intra-and extracellular hydrogen peroxide was involved in the immobilization of the sperm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The shorter wavelengths of visible light are detrimental to the mobility of bovine spermatozoa (Norman and Goldberg, 1959;Van Duijn, 1961;Norman et al, 1962;Foote, 1967) and similarly, "visible" light immobilized sea urchin sperm (Wells and Giese, 1950). In all of these reports, the production of intra-and extracellular hydrogen peroxide was involved in the immobilization of the sperm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The addition of catalase (Giese and Wells, 1952;Norman etal., 1962;Foote, 1967) or the removal of oxygen in the sperm's environment (Foote, 1967) afforded the sperm protection from light. Norman et al, (1962) found that light exposure of 4, 7, and 10 hr had a progressively more damaging effect on the fertilizing capacity of chicken semen stored in a phosphate-glucose 'Paper No. 9582 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, NC 27695-7601.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the relationship between wavelength and photosensitized oxidation in sperm suggested that blue light produced maximum harm. Exposure of sperm to the relatively energy-rich red end of the spectrum had no effect on their progressive motility (Norman, Goldberg & Porterfield, 1960).…”
Section: Norman and Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the prokaryotes visible radiation and near-ultraviolet radiation have been reported to kill or inhibit the growth of the heterotropic bacteria Streptococcus salivarius (4), Escherichia coli (17,19,20) (8,31), the colorless algae Prototheca zopfii (14) and Astasia longa (8), and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (10,15,24,25,34), have also been reported to be inhibited by blue light. Various processes in cells of higher plants and animals have also been reported to be inhibited by blue or near-ultraviolet light, such as cell division (21, 42), respiration (35,33) and motility of sperm (41,28,29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various processes in cells of higher plants and animals have also been reported to be inhibited by blue or near-ultraviolet light, such as cell division (21,42), respiration (35,33) and motility of sperm (41,28,29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%