1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0026-2862(82)80009-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of ultrasound on microvascular hemodynamics in skeletal muscle: Effects during ischemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
1
5

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
24
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study comparing the US treatment group and a placebo US group, statistically significant improvements were identified with US treatment in the majority of the evaluation parameters (pain at movement and at rest, NDI and NHP pain and physical capabilities subgroups), and improvements were sustained up to the end of the third month. Some theories on the effectiveness of US treatment in pain control in MPS have been suggested, including: increased blood flow depending on the pain-causing mediators to be removed from the environment (18), nerve conduction changes or cell membrane permeability changes depending on the reduction in inflammation (19), increased capillary density in muscle tissue (20), energy consumption improvement in the cell (21), increased angiogenesis in ischemic tissue (22), and acceleration of the healing of tissue and improved persistent muscle spasm (23). In addition to these mechanisms, stimulation of somatosensory receptors within the trigger points may reduce regional pain sensation, which in turn may decrease the sensitivity of trigger points or even result in their resolution by means of relaxation in tight bands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study comparing the US treatment group and a placebo US group, statistically significant improvements were identified with US treatment in the majority of the evaluation parameters (pain at movement and at rest, NDI and NHP pain and physical capabilities subgroups), and improvements were sustained up to the end of the third month. Some theories on the effectiveness of US treatment in pain control in MPS have been suggested, including: increased blood flow depending on the pain-causing mediators to be removed from the environment (18), nerve conduction changes or cell membrane permeability changes depending on the reduction in inflammation (19), increased capillary density in muscle tissue (20), energy consumption improvement in the cell (21), increased angiogenesis in ischemic tissue (22), and acceleration of the healing of tissue and improved persistent muscle spasm (23). In addition to these mechanisms, stimulation of somatosensory receptors within the trigger points may reduce regional pain sensation, which in turn may decrease the sensitivity of trigger points or even result in their resolution by means of relaxation in tight bands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of reports have non-thermal ultrasound to stimulate protein synthesis, increase blood flow and enhance bone healing, all of which aid in the recovery process (Dyson and Luke 1986, Hogan et al 1982, Pilla et al 1990). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the physiological process of healing, the TU has a protective function by means of the neutralization of irritating chemical substances and by the precursor stimulus of the scar 4 . The TU treatment was administered in five-minutes daily sessions, following the recommendations for the acute phase of the lesion 20,21 , besides taking into account the lesion area and the muscle length. Other authors suggest that the beneficial effects of TU can be obtained with low intensities (0.5W/cm 2 ) 22,23 , shorter exposures ( five and six minutes) 22,23 , work cycles of 1:5 (2ms on and 8ms off, 20%) 23 and pulse modes 24 , with low heat production, as were the parameters used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%