2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of trunk electric vibration on the growth, yield and fruit quality of peach trees (Prunus persica [L.] Batsch)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study, electronic shaking reduced the heights of peach trees by 80% [28]; while this did not affect fruit weight, it did reduce flowering density and fruit growth by changing the angle between the fruiting branches and the main stem [29]. Some plants respond positively to mechanical stimuli [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, electronic shaking reduced the heights of peach trees by 80% [28]; while this did not affect fruit weight, it did reduce flowering density and fruit growth by changing the angle between the fruiting branches and the main stem [29]. Some plants respond positively to mechanical stimuli [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, when peach plants were vibrated, the regenerated shoots displayed a phenotype resembling thigmomorphogenesis (Onguso et al, 2006). The young internodes of P. vulgaris were shown to be more sensitive to rubbing and mechanical stress reduced the growth of the fourth internode which was not present at the start of the rubbing (Jaffe, 1976).…”
Section: Linking Somatic Memory To Phenotypes Of Thigmomorphogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPs induced by wind, touch, and dynamic flexing have all been shown to induce ethylene formation in vascular plants. It was the first plant growth regulator to be implicated in the response to MP (Goeschl et al, 1966;Brown and Leopold, 1973;Robitaille and Leopold, 1974;Hiraki and Ota, 1975;Jaffe and Biro, 1979;Biro and Jaffe, 1984;Prasad and Cline, 1985;Telewski and Jaffe, 1986;de Jaegher et al, 1987;Telewski, 1990;Emery et al, 1994;Onguso et al, 2006;Love et al, 2009). Researchers were also able to mimic the effects of MP with the application of exogenous ethylene (Mitchell, 1977;Biro et al, 1980;Erner et al, 1980;Telewski and Jaffe, 1981;Erner and Jaffe, 1983;Prasad and Cline, 1985).…”
Section: Plant Growth Regulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%