2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.05.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the cortical activation by motor task in the human brain: An fMRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
45
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lang et al (2005), as in our study, showed that only cathodal tDCS had a lasting effect on movement-related activity and suggested that cathodal tDCS might be more effective at interfering with motor execution than anodal tDCS. With a longer tDCS stimulation protocol (20 minutes; more than three times longer than our current protocol), Jang et al (2009) have observed a small increase in brain activation under the anode after stimulation. Although the differences in stimulation intensities and duration cannot be entirely excluded as cause for the absence of an anodal effect, the asymmetry of transcallosal inhibition between dominant and nondominant hemisphere should be considered (Netz et al, 1995).…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Lang et al (2005), as in our study, showed that only cathodal tDCS had a lasting effect on movement-related activity and suggested that cathodal tDCS might be more effective at interfering with motor execution than anodal tDCS. With a longer tDCS stimulation protocol (20 minutes; more than three times longer than our current protocol), Jang et al (2009) have observed a small increase in brain activation under the anode after stimulation. Although the differences in stimulation intensities and duration cannot be entirely excluded as cause for the absence of an anodal effect, the asymmetry of transcallosal inhibition between dominant and nondominant hemisphere should be considered (Netz et al, 1995).…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…On the other hand, increasing the intensity or duration of the stimulation might also result in different effects. Indeed, it was lately observed that the BOLD signal evoked by grasping hand movements in a consecutive paradigm was increased in the sensorimotor area after 20 min anodal tDCS when compared to baseline (Jang et al, 2009). The authors concluded that a longer application of tDCS and a simpler motor task might be better to detect changes in cortical activation than the more complex tasks used by Baudewig et al (2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of previous combined tDCS and functional neuroimaging studies have focused on motor cortex stimulation, also including motor activation paradigms. Most studies found fMRI signal changes close to the stimulation site and in distant regions (Kwon et al, 2008;Jang et al, 2009;Stagg et al, 2009). Lang et al (2005) used H 2 15 O PET and observed an increased regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in widespread cortical and subcortical areas that reached the magnitude of effects of finger movement on rCBF in motor areas and were stable for ϳ50 min.…”
Section: Effects Of Tdcs In Models and Imaging Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%