2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4101(00)00029-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of transaction structure on price: Evidence from subsidiary sales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He shows that the probability that a sale is structured as a "taxable deal," financed with tax-deductible debt, increases with the acquirer's tax rate; however, he finds no evidence that seller tax characteristics affect deal structure. Erickson and Wang (2000) find that the price of subsidiary sales can be affected by tax considerations. These authors show that premiums (and seller abnormal stock returns) increase when the sale is structured to allow a step-up in subsidiary basis, so that the acquiring firm receives additional depreciation tax benefits.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…He shows that the probability that a sale is structured as a "taxable deal," financed with tax-deductible debt, increases with the acquirer's tax rate; however, he finds no evidence that seller tax characteristics affect deal structure. Erickson and Wang (2000) find that the price of subsidiary sales can be affected by tax considerations. These authors show that premiums (and seller abnormal stock returns) increase when the sale is structured to allow a step-up in subsidiary basis, so that the acquiring firm receives additional depreciation tax benefits.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…It may because that the financial risks of unprofitable firms increase debt tax shield effects, then decrease depreciation shield effects and offset the tax savings of acquiring enterprises, resulting in "traps" in tax synergistic effect. [8] Correlation of tax synergy and M&A. According to the results of empirical test, correlation effect in M&A has a significant impact on tax synergy in the third and fourth years on the level of 10%.…”
Section: Empirical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these transactions it is not uncommon for the deal to be structured to include a §338(h)(10) election, resulting in a step-up in the tax basis of the acquired entity's assets (see Erickson and Wang (2000), Ayers, Lefanowitz and Robinson (2000), and Erickson and Wang (2003)). Thus, in acquisitions of subsidiaries and conduit entities, the tax bases of the target's assets are often recorded at fair market value.…”
Section: Merger and Acquisition Valuation Issues -The Inside/outside mentioning
confidence: 99%