The Effect of Time Pressure in Multiattribute Binary Choice Tasks

Böckenholt, Ulf; Kroeger, Keith

doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-6846-6_14

Cited by 16 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Prior work has demonstrated that the amount of time a DM has to make a decision affects both information search (Ben-Zur & Breznitz, 1981;Böckenholt & Kroeger, 1993; and strategy selection (Rieskamp & Hoffrage, 1999, 2008. In particular, Rieskamp and Hoffrage (1999) found that by directly limiting the amount of time to make a decision, participants were more likely to use non-compensatory strategies that are lexicographic in structure.…”

Section: Time Pressure Manipulationmentioning

confidence: 96%

Individual differences in the algebraic structure of preferences

Davis‐Stober

Brown

Cavagnaro

2015

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Time Pressure Manipulationmentioning

confidence: 96%

Individual differences in the algebraic structure of preferences

Davis‐Stober

Brown

Cavagnaro

2015

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…These three steps are hierarchical. In the acceleration step, people try to process tasks faster; in a more difficult situation, they filter information; and in the next step, they change to the simplification strategy 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in attention, hand dexterity, and lower extremity activities in the presence or absence of a time limit

2017

J Phys Ther Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate how a time limit affects day-to-day tasks such as attention, hand dexterity, and sit to standing and sitting activity. The grounds for using a time limit as a method of learning tasks related to daily living are examined based on the results of this investigation. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects consisted of 51 healthy college students (20 males and 31 females). The task performance time for SESSION 1, in which there was no time limit, was measured and the task duration privately recorded. The task performance for SESSION 2 was then measured with a time limit of the same duration as the time recorded for SESSION 1. Attention was measured using the trail-making test, hand dexterity using the Purdue pegboard test, and lower extremity activity using the sit to standing and sitting test. [Results] The levels for the attention, hand dexterity, and lower extremity activities were high in the environment in which a time limit was set. The differences between the genders depending on the presence or absence of a time limit was insignificant. [Conclusion] A time limit environment can be used as a task-training method for attention, hand dexterity, and lower extremity activities

show abstract

“…Time pressures have been shown to affect the quality of decision making [15], reduce the decision-maker's confidence in their own decisions [16,17], increase their reliance on gestalt as opposed to more objectively derived external sources of information [18] and change the cognitive strategy by neglecting categories of Fig. 1 Common processing strategy used by clinicians when assessing serious adverse events information which reduce the total amount of information processed [19].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%