2020
DOI: 10.3390/ani10122450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of the Type of Non-Caged Housing System, Genotype and Age on the Behaviour of Laying Hens

Abstract: This study investigated the welfare of laying hens in different non-caged housing systems, namely a deep-litter barn system (BS), a free-range system (FRS) and an organic system (OS). The study was conducted on 270 hens of a native breed Green-legged Partridge (Z-11) and 270 Hy-Line Brown hybrids. Visual scans were performed to record behaviour of hens. Hens were housed in groups of 30 and observed over the course of one day at 20, 36 and 56 weeks of age. Dustbathing, scratching, wing stretching, wing flapping… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(79 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Hocking et al [ 29 ] found that birds spent less time resting, more time foraging (pecking and scratching), and pecked more at the feather bunch at older ages. Sokolowicz et al [ 30 ] found that age had a concomitant influence on the agonistic behavior of birds. According to the results of Coban et al [ 27 ], profitability can be reduced as a result of decreased body weight gain and increased feed conversion rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Hocking et al [ 29 ] found that birds spent less time resting, more time foraging (pecking and scratching), and pecked more at the feather bunch at older ages. Sokolowicz et al [ 30 ] found that age had a concomitant influence on the agonistic behavior of birds. According to the results of Coban et al [ 27 ], profitability can be reduced as a result of decreased body weight gain and increased feed conversion rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scratching Scraping of the litter with the claws (Ipema et al, 2020) Preening Grooming of own feathers with beak (Ipema et al, 2020) Trotting Increasing walking step with head high and breast out (Veldkamp and van Niekerk, 2019) Pecking pen mate Pecking movements directed at the body or beak of a pen mate (Ipema et al, 2020) Stretching Stretching one wing together with the leg at the same side or both wings upward and forward (Martin et al, 2005) Chasing One hen chasing another, with fast running, no vocalisations, no hopping and no wing flapping (Sokołowicz et al, 2020) Wing flapping Number of wing beats, often while the bird is standing on the toes (Martin et al, 2005) Shaking Body/wing shake when the plumage is not in order (Martin et al, 2005) Dust bathing Sitting and performing: vertical wing-shaking, body shaking, litter pecking and/or scratching, bill raking, side and head rubbing (van Hierden et al, 2002) Allopreening Social preening (Kenny et al, 2017)…”
Section: Frequency Behaviour Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity space of each hen is 6.6–8.3 square meters, well above the set welfare standards and comprising the lowest density of the three systems discussed here. This provides enough private space for laying hens to express comfortable behaviour [ 104 , 135 ]. Extensive outdoor space relieves stress and fear of laying hens [ 136 ].…”
Section: Dawn Of the Implementation Of The Free-range System: Underst...mentioning
confidence: 99%