2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2016.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the support program on the resilience of female family caregivers of stroke patients: Randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it can also be considered one element within a multi-dimensional understanding of resilience. This association was demonstrated experimentally in the one intervention study that was identified by the review (Inci & Temel, 2016), advancing previous observational family caregiver studies in other neurologic groups between resilience and social support (e.g., TBI, .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it can also be considered one element within a multi-dimensional understanding of resilience. This association was demonstrated experimentally in the one intervention study that was identified by the review (Inci & Temel, 2016), advancing previous observational family caregiver studies in other neurologic groups between resilience and social support (e.g., TBI, .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Turning to the two quantitative studies (Qiu & Li, 2008;Teel, Duncan, Lai & Min, 2001) spirituality was a secondary finding as measured by the well-validated Brief Cope scale (Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub, 1989) and Spiritual Perspective Scale (SPS) (Reed, 1986) respectively. One study focused on multiple constructs of resilience (Inci & Temel, 2016) as measured by the Family Index of Regenerativity and Adaptation -General (FIRA-G). No research was found examining the relationship between spirituality and resilience in family caregivers of individuals with stroke.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean difference of resilience before and after the intervention in the intervention group and control groups was significantly different (Table 1). The results of İnci and Temel (2016) study are congruent with this result. After comparing the resilience scores of the samples in the test and control groups after the intervention, a significant difference was found between the two groups where the resilience score of the subjects in test group increased.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Thirty-one RCTs were identified; 12 targeted stroke survivors, [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] 10 carers, [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] and 11 survivor-carer dyads. 31,39,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] Overall, 3636 stroke survivors and 2079 carers were included between 1997-2018.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coping was measured in six trials; 35,37,38,46,47,50 : four of interventions for carers 35,37,38,50 and two for survivor-carer dyads 46,47 reported significant improvements. The provision of social support, psycho education and problem solving improved coping in all six trials.…”
Section: Copingmentioning
confidence: 99%