2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/6751305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of the Rolling Direction, Temperature, and Etching Time on the Photochemical Machining of Monel 400 Microchannels

Abstract: The present paper describes the effect of the rolling direction on the quality of microchannels manufactured using photochemical machining (PCM) of Monel 400. Experiments were carried out to fabricate microchannels along and across the rolling direction to investigate the effect of the grain orientation on microchannel etching. The input parameters considered were channel width and rolling direction, whereas the depth of etch was the response parameters. Different channels of widths of 60, 100, 150, 200, and 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these processes, WEDM has higher machining efficiency and could provide higher flexibility in machining regular and complex shapes and profiles with high precision for microfeatures, especially for conductive materials [7]. Additionally, it is worth mentioning that, as compared to the laser machining and photochemical machining, the WEDM process has a higher capacity to control the shape of the microchannels, because the laser produces tapered channels as demonstrated by Ahmed et al [8] and has deep detrimental impact [9], whereas, Micromachines 2020, 11, 469 2 of 17 the photochemical machining produces channels with undercuts as shown by Patil and Mudigonda [5]. In addition, the photochemical process is a slower process, not environmentally safe and can only be applied for mass production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among these processes, WEDM has higher machining efficiency and could provide higher flexibility in machining regular and complex shapes and profiles with high precision for microfeatures, especially for conductive materials [7]. Additionally, it is worth mentioning that, as compared to the laser machining and photochemical machining, the WEDM process has a higher capacity to control the shape of the microchannels, because the laser produces tapered channels as demonstrated by Ahmed et al [8] and has deep detrimental impact [9], whereas, Micromachines 2020, 11, 469 2 of 17 the photochemical machining produces channels with undercuts as shown by Patil and Mudigonda [5]. In addition, the photochemical process is a slower process, not environmentally safe and can only be applied for mass production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, in nickel-base alloys, the machining of such alloys is hardly carried out in conventional machining processes, especially in the case of machining microfeatures, due to their superior mechanical properties in addition to the lower thermal conductivity, high heat capacity and high chemical reactivity to most tool materials [3,4]. High tooling wear, poor surface quality, and poor machinability are obvious drawbacks of conventional micromilling and consequently restrict the process for precise microfeaturing [5,6]. These issues could be overcome using non-traditional machining processes such as laser beam machining (LBM), photochemical machining (PCM), abrasive water jet machining (AWJM) and wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saraf and Sadaiah studied effect of magnetic field on the etch rate of SS316L [5]. Patil and Mudigonda conducted experiments on Inconel 718 for understanding the effects of control variables such as speed of cutting, rate of feed, and depth of cut on surface finish and residual stresses at different level of parameters [6]. Qu et al carried out the study on Monel 400 using PCM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Monel 400 is chosen for this study. Generally, micromachining, laser machining, dry machining and wet chemical machining have been used for fabrication of microchannel [2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%