Abstract:Since scientific interest in rhubarb from a culinary point of view is a relatively new issue, the aim of this study was to test five edible cultivars of Rheum rhabarbarum L. (‘Poncho’, ‘Canadian Red’, ‘Valentine’, ‘Red Champagne’, and ‘Victoria’) from a specific culinary perspective, i.e., processing into juice. Total yields (t/ha) were established in six harvests during a two-year field experiment. For juice production and subsequent laboratory analysis, rhubarb petioles from two different harvest terms were … Show more
“…Among physicochemical characteristics of rhubarb juice, the density, total dissolved solids (TDS) and monosaccharides content demonstrated the lowest varietal differences ( Table 2 ), which suggests that the values of these parameters are typical of rhubarb varieties grown in the same conditions. Similar low variations in sugar content were recorded by Mezeyova et al [ 32 ] in five rhubarb cultivars. Among the cultivars tested, only cv.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The data presented in Table 1 indicate that among the rhubarb cultivars tested, cv. Upryamets had the highest stalk yield, which exceeded that of the other cultivars by 1.4–1.8 times ( Table 1 ) and was close to the values of five Slovak cultivars reported by Mezeyova et al [ 32 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Their content and composition are genetically governed; affect plant adaptability; provide antibacterial, antifungal and antiparasitic defense; and are directly related to juice quality [ 50 , 51 ]. The comparison between the results of our research with those of other researchers [ 1 , 13 , 32 , 52 , 53 ] has demonstrated the rather close values of the total organic acids content, within the range of 17–22 g·L −1 . On the other hand, to date, the information about the organic acids composition of rhubarb juice/stalks is rather scant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…To date, researchers have paid predominant attention to the production of rhubarb juice [ 1 , 32 ]. Indeed, depending on the production technology, its yield may reach up to 80–90%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of garden rhubarb for human health and nutrition has promoted various investigations addressed to optimize juice production [ 1 , 32 ], root antioxidant characteristics [ 28 ], pharmaceutical potential [ 25 ] and utilization in the food industry [ 1 ]. On the other hand, the complex characterization and processing of rhubarb plants have not been performed so far, also due to high levels of oxalic acid, which is toxic for human organisms at remarkable concentrations because of calcium oxalate precipitation.…”
The complex evaluation of varietal biochemical differences in rhubarb juice, pomace and roots is highly useful to develop an efficient processing technology. Research was carried out to compare four rhubarb cultivars (Malakhit, Krupnochereshkovy, Upryamets and Zaryanka) in terms of the quality and antioxidant parameters of juice, pomace and roots. The laboratory analyses showed a high juice yield (75–82%) with a relatively high content of ascorbic acid (125–164 mg L−1) and other organic acids (16–21 g L−1). Citric, oxalic and succinic acids accounted for 98% of the total acids amount. The juice of the cultivar Upryamets demonstrated high levels of the natural preservatives sorbic (36.2 mg L−1) and benzoic acids (11.7 mg L−1), which are highly valuable in juice production. The juice pomace proved to be an excellent source of pectin and dietary fiber, whose concentrations reached 21–24% and 59–64%, respectively. The total antioxidant activity decreased according to the following sequence: root pulp (161–232 mg GAE g−1 d.w.) > root peel (115–170 mg GAE g−1 d.w.) > juice pomace (28.3–34.4 mg GAE g−1 d.w.) > juice (4.4–7.6 mg GAE g−1 f.w.), suggesting that root pulp is a highly valuable antioxidant source. The results of this research highlight the interesting prospects of the complex rhubarb plant processing for the production of juice, containing a wide spectrum of organic acids and natural stabilizers (sorbic and benzoic acids), dietary fiber and pectin (juice pomace) and natural antioxidants (roots).
“…Among physicochemical characteristics of rhubarb juice, the density, total dissolved solids (TDS) and monosaccharides content demonstrated the lowest varietal differences ( Table 2 ), which suggests that the values of these parameters are typical of rhubarb varieties grown in the same conditions. Similar low variations in sugar content were recorded by Mezeyova et al [ 32 ] in five rhubarb cultivars. Among the cultivars tested, only cv.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The data presented in Table 1 indicate that among the rhubarb cultivars tested, cv. Upryamets had the highest stalk yield, which exceeded that of the other cultivars by 1.4–1.8 times ( Table 1 ) and was close to the values of five Slovak cultivars reported by Mezeyova et al [ 32 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Their content and composition are genetically governed; affect plant adaptability; provide antibacterial, antifungal and antiparasitic defense; and are directly related to juice quality [ 50 , 51 ]. The comparison between the results of our research with those of other researchers [ 1 , 13 , 32 , 52 , 53 ] has demonstrated the rather close values of the total organic acids content, within the range of 17–22 g·L −1 . On the other hand, to date, the information about the organic acids composition of rhubarb juice/stalks is rather scant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…To date, researchers have paid predominant attention to the production of rhubarb juice [ 1 , 32 ]. Indeed, depending on the production technology, its yield may reach up to 80–90%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of garden rhubarb for human health and nutrition has promoted various investigations addressed to optimize juice production [ 1 , 32 ], root antioxidant characteristics [ 28 ], pharmaceutical potential [ 25 ] and utilization in the food industry [ 1 ]. On the other hand, the complex characterization and processing of rhubarb plants have not been performed so far, also due to high levels of oxalic acid, which is toxic for human organisms at remarkable concentrations because of calcium oxalate precipitation.…”
The complex evaluation of varietal biochemical differences in rhubarb juice, pomace and roots is highly useful to develop an efficient processing technology. Research was carried out to compare four rhubarb cultivars (Malakhit, Krupnochereshkovy, Upryamets and Zaryanka) in terms of the quality and antioxidant parameters of juice, pomace and roots. The laboratory analyses showed a high juice yield (75–82%) with a relatively high content of ascorbic acid (125–164 mg L−1) and other organic acids (16–21 g L−1). Citric, oxalic and succinic acids accounted for 98% of the total acids amount. The juice of the cultivar Upryamets demonstrated high levels of the natural preservatives sorbic (36.2 mg L−1) and benzoic acids (11.7 mg L−1), which are highly valuable in juice production. The juice pomace proved to be an excellent source of pectin and dietary fiber, whose concentrations reached 21–24% and 59–64%, respectively. The total antioxidant activity decreased according to the following sequence: root pulp (161–232 mg GAE g−1 d.w.) > root peel (115–170 mg GAE g−1 d.w.) > juice pomace (28.3–34.4 mg GAE g−1 d.w.) > juice (4.4–7.6 mg GAE g−1 f.w.), suggesting that root pulp is a highly valuable antioxidant source. The results of this research highlight the interesting prospects of the complex rhubarb plant processing for the production of juice, containing a wide spectrum of organic acids and natural stabilizers (sorbic and benzoic acids), dietary fiber and pectin (juice pomace) and natural antioxidants (roots).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.