2014
DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2013.60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of testosterone replacement therapy on prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: This meta-analysis shows that regardless of the administration method, TRT is the short-term safety and does not promote prostate cancer development or progression but long-term data are warranted with justifiable end points.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Other data have confirmed these findings and propose a threshold level of approximately 8.6 mmol/l [Rastrelli et al 2013]. Several studies also support the use of testosterone in men 'at risk' for prostate cancer without increasing their baseline odds of prostate cancer development [Roddam et al 2008;Muller et al 2012;Cui et al 2014]. Yet the absence of large, long-term randomized controlled trials precludes a definitive answer and at-risk men should be appropriately screened for prostate cancer prior to initiation of, and at regular intervals, during treatment.…”
Section: Controversies and Risksupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Other data have confirmed these findings and propose a threshold level of approximately 8.6 mmol/l [Rastrelli et al 2013]. Several studies also support the use of testosterone in men 'at risk' for prostate cancer without increasing their baseline odds of prostate cancer development [Roddam et al 2008;Muller et al 2012;Cui et al 2014]. Yet the absence of large, long-term randomized controlled trials precludes a definitive answer and at-risk men should be appropriately screened for prostate cancer prior to initiation of, and at regular intervals, during treatment.…”
Section: Controversies and Risksupporting
confidence: 61%
“…64 Meta-analyses of placebocontrolled T therapy trials have documented no increased risk of PCa in men receiving T therapy. 65 In men who received T therapy, there was no increased risk of high-grade disease. 66,67 Although lowering serum T concentration into the castrate range clearly causes PCa regression and reduces prostate-specific antigen levels, the evidence indicates a limited ability of androgens to stimulate PCa growth, with maximal androgenic stimulation achieved at low T concentrations.…”
Section: Resolution 8 the Evidence Does Not Support Increased Risk Omentioning
confidence: 98%
“…В крупных проспективных исследованиях долгосрочного на-блюдения не было выявлено корреляции между эндо-генными концентрациями андрогенов и риском рака предстательной железы [64]. В мета-анализах плацебо-контролируемых исследований терапии тестостероном документировано отсутствие увеличения риска рака предстательной железы у мужчин, получающих тера-пию тестостероном [65]. У мужчин, получавших тера-пию тестостероном, отсутствовало увеличение риска рака предстательной железы высокой степени злокаче-ственности [66,67].…”
Section: заявление 8 существующие доказательные данные не подтверждаunclassified
“…Результаты долгосрочных наблюдений говорят об отсутствии зависимости между более высо-кими концентрациями тестостерона сыворотки и риском рака предстательной железы [64]. В мета-анализах не обнаружено увеличение риска рака предстательной железы у мужчин, получавших терапию тестостероном, по сравнению с плацебо [65]. Случаи заболевания с высокой степенью злокачественности и неблагоприятным прогнозом, напротив, коррелируют с низкими концентрациями тестостерона [63].…”
Section: ответы экспертовunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation