2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00162-002-0078-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Sweep-Angle Variation on the Turbulence Structure in a Separated, Three-Dimensional Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with reported results for a separated turbulent boundary layer by Dianat & Castro (1991). The production term P , becomes negative in this region which indicates strong deviation from equilibrium conditions as mentioned by Kaltenbach (2003). Above the shear layer zone, it is observed that turbulent transport in conjunction with convection becomes a source of turbulence kinetic energy.…”
Section: Turbulence Kinetic Energy and Budgetssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with reported results for a separated turbulent boundary layer by Dianat & Castro (1991). The production term P , becomes negative in this region which indicates strong deviation from equilibrium conditions as mentioned by Kaltenbach (2003). Above the shear layer zone, it is observed that turbulent transport in conjunction with convection becomes a source of turbulence kinetic energy.…”
Section: Turbulence Kinetic Energy and Budgetssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The profiles of cases C and D have values higher and lower than those predicted by the ZPG law, respectively. Near the reattachment zone, the flow is far from equilibrium owing to the presence of large scale vortices (Kiya & Sasaki 1985) and impingement of vortical structures on the wall (Shih & Ho 1994;Simpson 1996;Na & Moin 1998;Kaltenbach 2003;Dejoan & Leschziner 2004;Hudy et al 2007). The profiles measured from the top wall for case B collapse again and differ slightly from that of case C and D, where lower values are observed in inertial sublayer, indicative of APG.…”
Section: Mean Flowmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations