2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2003.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Turbulent flow over a swept backward-facing step

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence area on the downstream is increased obviously by downward flow from the step trailing edge. This phenomenon match the experimental result in Ref [8][9]. Figure7 shows the profiles of pressure isolines for different sweep angles at different z values along the x direction.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The influence area on the downstream is increased obviously by downward flow from the step trailing edge. This phenomenon match the experimental result in Ref [8][9]. Figure7 shows the profiles of pressure isolines for different sweep angles at different z values along the x direction.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The flow upstream of the step was laminar and shear-layer transition took place prior to reattachment. Further, Kaltenbach (2004) used Large Eddy Simulation to study turbulent flow over a swept backward facing step when Res = 5000 and for a range of swept angles. The configuration studied was the same as presented in Kaltenbach and Janke (2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regions above the plume, the flow approaches the BFS under an angle with the centerplane. The study by Kaltenbach [60] shows that the streamline reattachment length downstream of a BFS rotated by 40°about a vertical axis reduces to 5.5 step heights, which further supports this assumption. Additionally, the flow is pushed towards the wall since the CRVP secondary flow adds a vertical component to the flow near the BFS.…”
Section: Effect Of a Bfs On The Mean Flowmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…For the studied cases, the BFS modifies the turbulent structure of the flow at about 15 to 16 times the step height downstream of the step. However, streamline reattachment at the centerplane occurs at a distance of 4 to 5 step heights, which is relatively close compared to undisturbed BFS wakes [59,60]. This might be explained by the secondary flow induced by the CRVP interacting with the BFS wake.…”
Section: Effect Of a Bfs On The Mean Flowmentioning
confidence: 82%