2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2012.04.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of substrate roughness on the static friction of CuO nanowires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments of Purtov et al [15] and modelling of the experiments by Pepelyshev et al [16], employing Galanov's model of adhesion between rough surfaces [17], showed that consideration of real contact area is a very important factor in adhesive contact problems. This statement is also nicely confirmed by the analysis of nanoscale static friction by Polyakov et al [18], and various works that demonstrate the influence of roughness on the value of adhesive pull-off force (e.g., [19][20][21]).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Experiments of Purtov et al [15] and modelling of the experiments by Pepelyshev et al [16], employing Galanov's model of adhesion between rough surfaces [17], showed that consideration of real contact area is a very important factor in adhesive contact problems. This statement is also nicely confirmed by the analysis of nanoscale static friction by Polyakov et al [18], and various works that demonstrate the influence of roughness on the value of adhesive pull-off force (e.g., [19][20][21]).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The real contact area is another important parameter that can be modulated to tune the adhesion between two surfaces [34]. A nice example at nano/microscale has been given by S. Casado [5], who shows how the modulation of roughness and adhesion of two different violin bow hairs observed at nanoscale by AFM, may cause strong consequences at mascoscopic scale during the stick–slip phenomenon of the rubbing hairs surfaces and in fine such different acoustic outputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 As a consequence, surface texture, roughness and hydrophobic properties and the electric characteristics of contacted surfaces will significantly affect the magnitude of the friction force. [13][14][15][16] The previous studies were largely concerned with the determination of the static friction via bending manipulation. For instance, Bordag et al 12 tried to bend a NW into a "half circle" of the smallest possible radius.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 This study aimed to develop a simple and reliable method that can measure the kinetic and static friction forces of a NW/substrate system in the same test. In this method, a NW was bent at one end.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%