The Effect of Steps to Promote Higher Levels of Farm Animal Welfare across the EU. Societal versus Animal Scientists’ Perceptions of Animal Welfare

Abstract

Simple SummaryWe studied different EU production standards and initiatives to determine whether there is still room or not for further animal welfare improvement, and which should be the best way to achieve it. Many of the adopted measures in these standards and initiatives are scientifically supported, but other aspects that are equally important for animal welfare are not included in any of them. Animal welfare improvement should consider, for each country, those aspects actually benefiting animals, but also the social expectations within each country. Economic constraints might explain the gap between what society demands, and what farm animals actually need.AbstractInformation about animal welfare standards and initiatives from eight European countries was collected, grouped, and compared to EU welfare standards to detect those aspects beyond minimum welfare levels demanded by EU welfare legislation. Literature was reviewed to determine the scientific relevance of standards and initiatives, and those aspects going beyond minimum EU standards. Standards and initiatives were assessed to determine their strengths and weaknesses regarding animal welfare. Attitudes of stakeholders in the improvement of animal welfare were determined through a Policy Delphi exercise. Social perception of animal welfare, economic implications of upraising welfare levels, and differences between countries were considered. Literature review revealed that on-farm space allowance, climate control, and environmental enrichment are relevant for all animal categories. Experts’ assessment revealed that on-farm prevention of thermal stress, air quality, and races and passageways’ design were not sufficiently included. Stakeholders considered that housing conditions are particularly relevant regarding animal welfare, and that animal-based and farm-level indicators are fundamental to monitor the progress of animal welfare. The most notable differences between what society offers and what farm animals are likely to need are related to transportation and space availability, with economic constraints being the most plausible explanation.

Mutilating Procedures, Management Practices, and Housing Conditions That May Affect the Welfare of Farm Animals: Implications for Welfare Research

“…Such target values should be updated to reflect new knowledge and insights into animal welfare and the role of the stakeholders in the welfare discussion [ 166 ]. The accomplished animal welfare is the result of insights, moral concepts, and activities/actions of all stakeholders (see Figure 3 ) (see, e.g., [ 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 , 171 ]).…”

What Foods are Identified as Animal Friendly by Italian Consumers?

“…The increased concerns for food safety (Kramer, 1990;Sparks and Shepherd, 1994;Hughes, 1997;Kafka and von Alvensleben, 1998;Verbeke and Viaene, 2000) were followed by broader concerns, which progressively included the intangible features of the products and the ethics of the productive process (i.e., animal welfare, sustainability, fair trade) (Verbeke and Viaene, 2000;Raynolds, 2002;Mayfield et al, 2007;Miele and Ara, 2008;Martelli, 2009;Verbeke, 2009;Averós et al, 2013;Down and Burke, 2013;Vanhonacker and Verbeke, 2014).…”

Impact of Some Heavy Metals Toxicity on Behaviour, Biochemical and Histopathological Alterations in Adult Rats

“…Furthermore, animal behaviour and health are the most effective animal-based indicators, with researchers/ advisers scoring the highest means in case of animal behaviour Moreover, good feeding and housing are from the farm level indicators which are also important for welfare improvement (Averós et al, 2013).…”