1951
DOI: 10.1044/jshd.1603.258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect Of Speech Training On Silent Reading Achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1954
1954
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"age" groups due to the higher rate of neurological and motor development of females. Jones (1951) (1948) warns that regardless of the causal factor being studied in relation to reading, ,it must be considered in relation to many other factors which may render it impotent. This would indicate that de Hirsch's battery of tasks (1966) encompasses more avenues leading to reading than the sin gle task of verbal motoric sequencing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"age" groups due to the higher rate of neurological and motor development of females. Jones (1951) (1948) warns that regardless of the causal factor being studied in relation to reading, ,it must be considered in relation to many other factors which may render it impotent. This would indicate that de Hirsch's battery of tasks (1966) encompasses more avenues leading to reading than the sin gle task of verbal motoric sequencing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jones (53), utilizing Betts's theory (8) of sequential development of language as the rationale for his study, was able to show that an experimental group of normal third graders made significant gains in reading in comparison with a control group when exposed to a series of speech improvement lessons. Ketcham (56) endeavored to identify the growth matrix from which language is thought to emerge and to relate it to three principles in developmental anatomy and neuroanatomy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%