1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1991.tb00406.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of social contact on college students’ attitudes toward severely handicapped students and their educational integration

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Research on integration suggests that the major benefit of educational integrated programmes is the facilitation of intergroup contact between mentally handicapped and non‐handicapped students. The present study was designed to investigate the effect of different amounts of social contact with severely handicapped students on attitudes and emotional reactions of college students towards such students and their integration into mainstream education. The study was carried out in a tertiary college whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Six of the instruments (ACL, Behavioural Intention Scale, 46 CATCH, Foley Scale, PATHS, and SAQ) were used in two or more studies carried out by researchers other than those involved in the instruments' original development, while seven (Activity Preference List, Children's Attitude Toward Handicapped Scale, 47 Emotional Reaction Scale, 48 Social Distance Scale, 49 Semantic Differential Scale, 49 Friendship Activity Scale [FAS], 50 and Multi-Response Attitude Scale) were used in one other study by a different research group. The other six were used only by the original authors or by members of their research teams.…”
Section: Description Of Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six of the instruments (ACL, Behavioural Intention Scale, 46 CATCH, Foley Scale, PATHS, and SAQ) were used in two or more studies carried out by researchers other than those involved in the instruments' original development, while seven (Activity Preference List, Children's Attitude Toward Handicapped Scale, 47 Emotional Reaction Scale, 48 Social Distance Scale, 49 Semantic Differential Scale, 49 Friendship Activity Scale [FAS], 50 and Multi-Response Attitude Scale) were used in one other study by a different research group. The other six were used only by the original authors or by members of their research teams.…”
Section: Description Of Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Una variable que se ha demostrado estar relacionada con una actitud más positiva es el contacto previo con personas con discapacidad (Beh-Pajooh, 1991;de Laat et al, 2013;Kalyva y Agaliotis, 2013;Nikolaraizi y De Reybekiel, 2001;Nikolaraizi et al, 2005;Rosenbaum, Armstrong, y King, 1988;Scior, 2011;Siperstein et al, 2007;Slininger et al, 2000;Voeltz, 1980), sin embargo, otros autores obtuvieron resultados distintos ya que obtuvieron efectos negativos tras la experiencia previa con compañeros con discapacidad (Arampatzi et al, 2011;Godeau et al, 2010;Vignes et al, 2009). …”
Section: El Rol Del Compañero En La Inclusión De Alumnos Con Discapacunclassified
“…A pesar de que el tema es tratado en muchos de los estudios del ámbito, las variables de género y edad han demostrado ser menos consistentes en relación a las actitudes (Lijuan et al, 2015;Oh et al, 2010), no habiendo un claro consenso en la literatura y encontrando autores que han cuestionado la relación directa entre el género y la actitud hacia la inclusión (Beh-Pajooh, 1991;Duchane y French, 1998;Hodge, Davis, et al, 2002;Jobe et al, 1996;Kudláèek et 2010), ni brindar el apoyo adecuado y los programas individualizada a los alumnos con discapacidad (Block y Rizzo, 1995).…”
Section: Variables Relacionadas Con El Propio Docente (Atributos Y Peunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations