2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of size and quality of potato microtubers on quality of seed potatoes in the cultivar ‘Superior’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations were earlier made by Akita and Takayama (1994). In general, larger microtubers have better storage quality and sprouting ability than smaller ones (Park et al 2009).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similar observations were earlier made by Akita and Takayama (1994). In general, larger microtubers have better storage quality and sprouting ability than smaller ones (Park et al 2009).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…0.12 g) tended to desiccate under field condition, and were more susceptible to disease. Park et al (2009) noted microtubers less than 0.5 g lost moisture content more rapidly than larger ones. Wiersema et al (1987), using microtubers with an average weight of 0.63 g, found total tuber yield increased with increased size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, potato crops are susceptible to viral and fungal infections, resulting in yield loss and crop quality deterioration (Chen et al, 2018). The production of virus-free microtubers in sterile environments may reduce the risk of viral infection (Park et al, 2009). The morphogenesis of potato plantlets and the subsequent growth of microtubers are influenced by light (Halterman et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%