2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-007-0747-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of single and repeated UVB radiation on rabbit lens

Abstract: This study reveals the cumulative effect of repeated UVB irradiations, and shows that even a 48-hour interval between subsequent UVR-B exposures is not sufficient for the healing processes to restore lenticular integrity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As to lens damage, Bergmanson and Soderberg [27] reported that lens proteins changed after extended low doses of UVR exposure. Other studies have reported that a dose of 3.12 kJ/ m 2 UVB radiation had harmful effects on the lenticular tissue of rabbit eyes [28,29]. Moreover, Mody et al [30] reported that lens damage in albino rats would be larger under repeated exposure compared to a single exposure of the same dose of UVB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As to lens damage, Bergmanson and Soderberg [27] reported that lens proteins changed after extended low doses of UVR exposure. Other studies have reported that a dose of 3.12 kJ/ m 2 UVB radiation had harmful effects on the lenticular tissue of rabbit eyes [28,29]. Moreover, Mody et al [30] reported that lens damage in albino rats would be larger under repeated exposure compared to a single exposure of the same dose of UVB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Within the cell, lipid peroxides can damage DNA [75], induce a drop in total glutathione and dramatic change in the redox ratio of glutathione, and lead to the appearance of new fluorophores and large protein aggregates with low solubility (clouding matrix) in the lens matter [21,[76][77][78][79][80]. Some authors advanced the hypothesis that H 2 O 2 , free radical (O ÀÁ 2 , OH·), and singlet ( 1 D g O 2 ) forms of oxygen are toxic and may be generated in excessive amounts in several experimental cataracts and in human senile cataract as a consequence of lens photooxidation [40,81], radical generation by xenobiotics [59,[82][83][84][85], or impaired enzymatic and nonenzymatic defenses that exist in the eye lens [25,[86][87][88][89][90]. The lens is well equipped with enzymatic antioxidant protective systems (i.e., superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPO)) and endogenous free radical scavengers (e.g., glutathione and ascorbic acid), which both lose their efficiency with age and in cataracts [82,86,[91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98].…”
Section: O X I D a T I V E D A M A G E L I P I D P E R O X I D A T mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rabbit model is still being used to examine the effects of ultraviolet radiation on the development of cataracts (Hightower and McCready, 1992). While variations in method vary, in general the model is created by exposing the corneas of anesthetized rabbits to ultraviolet light from a distance of 0.05 m for various frequencies and durations to create different doses of radiation exposure (Fris et al, 2008). The rabbit model is being used to develop treatments for or protection against radiation-induced lens damage (Bigsby et al, 2009;Sasaki et al, 1998).…”
Section: Rabbit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%