2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-020-05041-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of simulation-based training in non-physician anesthetists in Tigray region, Ethiopia

Abstract: Objective: In Ethiopia simulation-based anesthesia education is a new way of teaching method which started in Mekelle University as of January, 2019. Hence, the purpose of this study is to evaluate whether simulation-based training improves non-physician anesthetists' knowledge and attitude on maternal and neonatal anesthesia cares or not. Results:Out of 50 study subjects, 66% had a working experience of less than 5 years. Knowledge score improved significantly from 49.78 to 66.22% in pretest and posttest resu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After that, they took pre and post simulation multiple choice question tests and the mean knowledge score was improved by 51%, whereas the mean knowledge score from pretest to posttest improved by 4.3% in our study. Furthermore, in another study by Etanaa et al from Ethiopia, [11] non-physician anesthetists attended a 3-day course and they had nine simulation scenarios, and eventually, the posttest scores improved by 16%. This difference in results may be related to the timing of the post-tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…After that, they took pre and post simulation multiple choice question tests and the mean knowledge score was improved by 51%, whereas the mean knowledge score from pretest to posttest improved by 4.3% in our study. Furthermore, in another study by Etanaa et al from Ethiopia, [11] non-physician anesthetists attended a 3-day course and they had nine simulation scenarios, and eventually, the posttest scores improved by 16%. This difference in results may be related to the timing of the post-tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%