The effect of several root-end filling materials on MG63 osteoblast-like cells

Lee, Jehee; Shon, Won‐Jun; Lee, Woo-Cheol; Baek, Seung‐Ho

doi:10.5395/jkacd.2010.35.3.222

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An ideal root perforation sealing material should be dimensionally stable, radiopaque, easy to be manipulated, atoxic, noncarcinogenic, nongenotoxic, and biocompatible, and if possible, it should stimulate the healing process. 1 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 Furthermore, this material should present adequate solubility in oral fluids, satisfactory working time, and antimicrobial activity. 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 17 Numerous studies have been conducted to study the similarities in the physicochemical properties of MTA and ordinary type I PC.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additional dental applications of MTA have been subsequently proposed, including direct pulp capping, external root resorption repair, and its use in the apexification therapy 3,4. This material has excellent physical, chemical, and biological properties 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. However, MTA presents one of the longest setting time among the root canal perforation sealer materials, forming a colloidal gel that solidifies in 2 hours and 30 minutes 14,15.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… 3 , 4 This material has excellent physical, chemical, and biological properties. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 However, MTA presents one of the longest setting time among the root canal perforation sealer materials, forming a colloidal gel that solidifies in 2 hours and 30 minutes. 14 , 15 In general, it is desirable for a material to harden as soon as possible in order to avoid significant contractions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparative analysis of physicochemical properties of root perforation sealer materials

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThis study evaluated the solubility, dimensional alteration, pH, electrical conductivity, and radiopacity of root perforation sealer materials.Materials and MethodsFor the pH test, the samples were immersed in distilled water for different periods of time. Then, the samples were retained in plastic recipients, and the electrical conductivity of the solution was measured. The solubility, dimensional alteration, and radiopacity properties were evaluated according to Specification No. 57 of the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association (ANSI/ADA). Statistical analyses were carried out using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test at a significance level of 5%. When the sample distribution was not normal, a nonparametric ANOVA was performed with a Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.05).ResultsThe results showed that white structural Portland cement (PC) had the highest solubility, while mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-based cements, ProRoot MTA (Dentsply-Tulsa Dental) and MTA BIO (Ângelus Ind. Prod.), had the lowest values. MTA BIO showed the lowest dimensional alteration values and white PC presented the highest values. No differences among the tested materials were observed in the the pH and electrical conductivity analyses. Only the MTA-based cements met the ANSI/ADA recommendations regarding radiopacity, overcoming the three steps of the aluminum step wedge.ConclusionsOn the basis of these results, we concluded that the values of solubility and dimensional alteration of the materials were in accordance with the ANSI/ADA specifications. PCs did not fulfill the ANSI/ADA requirements regarding radiopacity. No differences were observed among the materials with respect to the pH and electrical conductivity analyses.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative analysis of physicochemical properties of root perforation sealer materials

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to the manufacturer, this material contains biocompatible pure white powder composed of ceramic nano-particles and deionized water. Bioaggregate appeared to be biocompatible compared with WMTA on human pulp cells, PDL cells and MG63 cells 68,69…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biocompatibility of root-end filling materials: recent update

Saxena¹,

Gupta²,

Newaskar³

2013

Restor Dent Endod

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of a root-end filling is to establish a seal between the root canal space and the periradicular tissues. As root-end filling materials come into contact with periradicular tissues, knowledge of the tissue response is crucial. Almost every available dental restorative material has been suggested as the root-end material of choice at a certain point in the past. This literature review on root-end filling materials will evaluate and comparatively analyse the biocompatibility and tissue response to these products, with primary focus on newly introduced materials.

show abstract

Root-end filling materials - review

Borisova-Papancheva

Panov

Peev

et al. 2015

Scripta Scientifica Medicinae Dentalis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to describe different root-end filling materials according to the literature and to compare their antibacterial activity, sealing ability, biocompatibility and microleakage. The purpose of a root-end filling is to establish a seal between the root canal space and the periapical tissues. A number of materials have been suggested for use as root-end fillings, including gutta-percha, amalgam, Cavit, intermediate restorative material (IRM), super EBA, glass ionomers, composite resins, carboxylate cements, zync phosphate cements, zinc oxide-eugenol cements and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA).

show abstract

The effect of several root-end filling materials on MG63 osteoblast-like cells

Cited by 3 publications

References 21 publications

Comparative analysis of physicochemical properties of root perforation sealer materials

Comparative analysis of physicochemical properties of root perforation sealer materials

Biocompatibility of root-end filling materials: recent update

Root-end filling materials - review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About