One quarter of the 1958 British Birth cohort attended single-sex secondary schools. This paper asks whether sex-segregated schooling had any impact on the experience of gender differences in the labour market in mid-life. We examine outcomes at age 42, allowing for socio-economic origins and abilities measured in childhood. We find no net impact of single-sex schooling on the chances of being employed in 2000, nor on the horizontal or social class segregation of mid-life occupations. But we do find a positive premium (5%) on the wages of women (but not men), of having attended a single-sex school. This was accounted for by the relatively good performance of girls-only school students in post-16 qualifications, not by the wider range of subjects studied by both girls and boys at single-sex schools. Men's labour market attainments were more closely related to attending private schools and to parental class, suggesting that the intergenerational transmission of advantage, while not related to coeducation, is related to gender.
IntroductionAre gender differences in the labour market reinforced-or counteracted-by the declining practice of educating boys and girls in separate secondary schools? Coeducational schooling might have been expected to lead to greater mixing of the sexes in both further studies and professional life, but the opposite argument has also been made, especially for women: that co-education discourages girls from pursuing traditionally male occupational paths. A further claim made by advocates of single-sex schooling for girls, such as the Girls' Schools Association is that single-sex schooling produces women who are more likely to be high-fliers and pursue leadership positions in their careers. Counter to this, it can be argued that the reason that so many 'high-flying' women have attended single-sex schools is due to the prevalence of single-sex schooling in the private and selective sectors.Our study of the careers of the 1958 British cohort, for whom single-sex secondary schooling was still relatively common, has supported the view that it is co-educational Downloaded by [UQ Library] at 13:23 19 November 2014 312 A. Sullivan et al.schooling which exacerbates gender segregation, at least when it comes to academic qualifications (Sullivan et al., 2009;Sullivan et al., 2010). So, far from expecting sexsegregation in school to be reflected in a sex-segregated experience of the labour market in adult life, we would expect any association to be in the reverse direction, even allowing for the background advantages of the 1958 cohort which were associated with both attending single-sex schools and with employment in more integrated types of occupation as adults.Based on these findings, we may conjecture that co-educational rather than singlesex schools may have reinforced occupational gender stereotyping. If reducing the pressure towards gendered subject choices led to a better development of academic abilities at later stages, we should expect to see less gender segregated employment and higher remune...