The Effect of Sandblasting and Different Primers on Shear Bond Strength Between Yttria-tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal Ceramic and a Self-adhesive Resin Cement

Yi, Young; Ahn, Jin-Soo; Park, Yoon Jung; Jun, Sang Ho; Lee, In Bog; Cho, Byeong-Hoon; Son, Ho-Hyun; Seo, Deog-Gyu

doi:10.2341/13-149-l

Cited by 96 publications

(120 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This was due to a synergistic effect produced by the increased contact area on the chemical interactions between the 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) and carboxylic monomers of the Z-Prime Plus and the monolithic zirconia surface. The reported data of the present study on the effect of the sandblasting and priming agent application on bond strength is in agreement with previous studies 182028…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Shear bond strength of indirect composite material to monolithic zirconia

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSEThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of surface treatments on bond strength of indirect composite material (Tescera Indirect Composite System) to monolithic zirconia (inCoris TZI).MATERIALS AND METHODSPartially stabilized monolithic zirconia blocks were cut into with 2.0 mm thickness. Sintered zirconia specimens were divided into different surface treatment groups: no treatment (control), sandblasting, glaze layer & hydrofluoric acid application, and sandblasting + glaze layer & hydrofluoric acid application. The indirect composite material was applied to the surface of the monolithic zirconia specimens. Shear bond strength value of each specimen was evaluated after thermocycling. The fractured surface of each specimen was examined with a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope to assess the failure types. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey LSD tests (α=.05).RESULTSBond strength was significantly lower in untreated specimens than in sandblasted specimens (P<.05). No difference between the glaze layer and hydrofluoric acid application treated groups were observed. However, bond strength for these groups were significantly higher as compared with the other two groups (P<.05).CONCLUSIONCombined use of glaze layer & hydrofluoric acid application and silanization are reliable for strong and durable bonding between indirect composite material and monolithic zirconia.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…This conclusion is consistent 192123. Previous studies reported that sandblasting provide higher bond strength than grinding 2328. However, sandblasting caused surface damage and phase transformation (tetragonal to monoclinic) affects the mechanical properties and reliability of zirconia 2329…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 83%

Shear bond strength of indirect composite material to monolithic zirconia

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since it doesn't contain glass, it cannot be etched by hydrofluoric acid and tribochemical silica coating is not effective 1,2. Therefore, unlike conventional materials, the adhesion with luting cement is weak and the restoration easily falls off 1. Therefore, the tooth surface should be treated with conventional methods, but the inner zirconia surface needs special treatment 1,2,3,4…”

Section: Amentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, self-adhesive resin cement (SmartCem2, Dentsply, York, PA, USA; Rely X U200, 3M ESPE; BisCem, Bisco Inc.; PermaCem 2.0, DMG, Hamburg, Germany; Multilink Speed, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) may be conveniently used for cementation as saving time and reducing errors of multistep processing. The manufacturers do not recommend the use of additional surface treatment on restorations as the self-adhesive resin cement contains functional monomers, but the use of aforementioned primers significantly increase the bond strength 1,2. Zirconia adhesion needs improvement through further research and development.…”

Section: Amentioning

confidence: 99%

Zirconia surface treatment for successful bonding

Seo

2014

Restor Dent Endod

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[20][21][22] As for chemical bonding, many studies reported that using primers and resin cement based on 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) monomer increased bond strength. 23,24 They are considered as materials of choice for cementation of indirect alumina and zirconia restorations, since MDP monomer bonded directly to metal oxides and the phosphoric-acid groups of MDP can react with the oxide layer on the zirconia surface. 25,26 It was also shown in previous studies that the creation of a micro-retentive surface is an important factor for achieving strong and durable adhesion, and promotes as well the chemical reaction with MDP monomer.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Structural and Morphological Evaluation of Presintered Zirconia following Different Surface Treatments

Skienhe

Habchi

Ounsi

et al. 2018

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on roughness, grain size, and phase transformation of presintered zirconia. Materials and methods:Surface treatments included airborne particle abrasion (APA) before and after sintering with different particles shape, size, and pressure (50 μm Al 2 O 3 , 50 μm glass beads, and ceramic powder). Thirty-five square-shaped presintered yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) ceramic slabs (Zenostar ZR bridge, Wieland) were prepared (4 mm height × 10 mm width × 10 mm length) and polished with silicon carbide grit papers #800, 1000, 1200, 1500, and 2000 to ensure identical initial roughness. Specimens were divided into five groups according to surface treatment: group I (control): no surface treatment; group II: APA 50 μm Al 2 O 3 after sintering; group III: APA 50 μm Al 2 O 3 particles before sintering; group IV: APA 50 μm glass bead particles before sintering; and group V: APA ceramic powder before sintering. Specimens were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses, and tested for shear bond strength (SBS). Data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc tests for multiple comparisons Tukey's test (α ≥ 0.05). Results: Air abrasion before sintering significantly increased the surface roughness when compared with groups I and III. The highest tetragonal to monoclinic (t-m) phase transformation (0.07%) was observed in group III, and a reverse transformation was observed in presintered groups (0.01%). Regarding bond strength, there was a significant difference between APA procedures pre-and postsintering. Structural and Morphological Evaluation of Presintered Conclusion:Air abrasion before sintering is a valuable method for increasing surface roughness and SBS. The abrasive particles' size and type used before sintering had a little effect on phase transformation.Clinical significance: Air abrasion before sintering could be supposed to be an alternative surface treatment method to air abrasion after sintering.

show abstract

The Effect of Sandblasting and Different Primers on Shear Bond Strength Between Yttria-tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal Ceramic and a Self-adhesive Resin Cement

Abstract: Z-PRIME Plus primer application after air-abrasion presented the best results for improving the bond strength between Y-TZP ceramic and self-adhesive resin cement.

Cited by 96 publications

References 18 publications

Shear bond strength of indirect composite material to monolithic zirconia

Shear bond strength of indirect composite material to monolithic zirconia

Zirconia surface treatment for successful bonding

Structural and Morphological Evaluation of Presintered Zirconia following Different Surface Treatments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About