2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of sample preparation technique on determination of structure and nanomechanical properties of human cementum hard tissue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both ultrasectioned and polished specimens prepared from the apical third of mandibular third molars of human male subjects (donor age: 65-80 years) that had been sterilized using 0.26 Mrad c radiation, E r and H of the cementum tissue were markedly higher when dry specimens were used compared with wet specimens. 30 Depending on the specimen preparation method, the ratio of E for dry specimens to E for wet specimens was between 1.4 and 2.5 and the ratio of H for these specimens was between 2.2 and 3.3. 30 For the enamel of healthy premolar teeth extracted for orthodontic purposes (donor age:12-16 years), differences in various properties (E, H, shear modulus of the protein film, indentation creep, and indentation ''back-creep") were seen between specimens that had been dehydrated in ethanol, E of anterior osteons was higher than for posterior osteons when tested in a direction parallel to the bone's long axis.…”
Section: State Of Hydration Of Test Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For both ultrasectioned and polished specimens prepared from the apical third of mandibular third molars of human male subjects (donor age: 65-80 years) that had been sterilized using 0.26 Mrad c radiation, E r and H of the cementum tissue were markedly higher when dry specimens were used compared with wet specimens. 30 Depending on the specimen preparation method, the ratio of E for dry specimens to E for wet specimens was between 1.4 and 2.5 and the ratio of H for these specimens was between 2.2 and 3.3. 30 For the enamel of healthy premolar teeth extracted for orthodontic purposes (donor age:12-16 years), differences in various properties (E, H, shear modulus of the protein film, indentation creep, and indentation ''back-creep") were seen between specimens that had been dehydrated in ethanol, E of anterior osteons was higher than for posterior osteons when tested in a direction parallel to the bone's long axis.…”
Section: State Of Hydration Of Test Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Depending on the specimen preparation method, the ratio of E for dry specimens to E for wet specimens was between 1.4 and 2.5 and the ratio of H for these specimens was between 2.2 and 3.3. 30 For the enamel of healthy premolar teeth extracted for orthodontic purposes (donor age:12-16 years), differences in various properties (E, H, shear modulus of the protein film, indentation creep, and indentation ''back-creep") were seen between specimens that had been dehydrated in ethanol, E of anterior osteons was higher than for posterior osteons when tested in a direction parallel to the bone's long axis. In the orthogonal direction, the trend was reversed.…”
Section: State Of Hydration Of Test Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specimens for AFM and AFM-based nanoindentation were prepared using an ultrasectioning method which was described previously [13]. Ultrasectioning was used to generate a relatively flat surface to maintain orthogonality between the nano-probes of the AFM and AFM-based nanoindenter and the specimen.…”
Section: Specimen Preparation For Atomic Force Microscopy and Afm-basmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Si 3 N 4 tip attached to a 'V-shaped' type 'D' microlever with a nominal spring constant of 0.06 N/m (DNP, Veeco Probes, Camarillo, CA) at a scanning frequency of 1.5 Hz was used to scan the surfaces of the ultrasectioned block specimens. The nominal radius of curvature of the tip was less than 50 nm [13]. Areas as large as 100 × 100 μm 2 were evaluated using a 'J' type piezo scanner.…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscopy and Afm-based Nanoindentation Of Ultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite morphological differences between cementum, dentin and bone, they are composed mainly of collagen and hydroxiapatite (5). Generally, cementum is least mineralized when compared to the others hard tissues: enamel, dentin and bone (15), and is less hard and more permeable compared with enamel and dentin (6). In Adhesive Dentistry, a rough substrate offers an increased contact surface that means the best micromechanical retention of the system substrate-adhesive (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%