The effect of saliva decontamination procedures on dentin bond strength after universal adhesive curing

Kim, Jayang; Hong, Sung-Ok; Choi, Yun Young; Park, Su-Jung

doi:10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.299

Cited by 14 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous studies showed that etching after saliva contamination can increase the bond strength, and this is consistent with our findings [16][17][18]. Group VI, which underwent Cohesive failure 0 0 0 0 0 0 additional PAA conditioning after saliva contamination, showed the highest SBS value among the saliva contaminated groups.…”

Section: ⅳ Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Effect of Saliva Contamination Stage and Different Decontamination Procedures on Bonding Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer

Go¹,

Park²,

Lee³

et al. 2019

THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to compare the bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) to dentin with saliva contamination at different stages and using different decontamination procedures. Extracted human permanent molars were embedded onto acrylic resin with the dentin surface exposed. Group I was a control group that was conditioned with polyacrylic acid (PAA). Groups II and III were contaminated with saliva before PAA conditioning and Groups IV, V, and VI were contaminated with saliva after PAA conditioning. After saliva contamination, Groups II and IV were dried, Groups III and V were rinsed and dried, and Group VI was additionally conditioned with PAA. After surface treatment, the dentin specimens were filled with RMGI. Group I showed significantly higher bond strength than the other groups. Group VI showed a significantly higher bond strength than the other saliva contaminated groups. However, there were no significant differences in the failure mode between the different groups. Saliva contamination impaired the bond strength of RMGI to dentin, regardless of when the saliva contamination occurred. Decontamination with washing and drying could not improve the shear bond strength of RMGIC. When saliva contamination occurred after PAA conditioning, additional PAA conditioning improved the shear bond strength.

show abstract

Section: ⅳ Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Effect of Saliva Contamination Stage and Different Decontamination Procedures on Bonding Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer

Go¹,

Park²,

Lee³

et al. 2019

THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…11,12 The decrease in bond strength after contamination has been correlated to the type of adhesive system, to the stage of the procedure in which the contamination occurs and to the type of contaminant, i.e., blood or saliva. 13 The literature agrees that blood contamination results in lower adhesive strength values than salivary contamination. A reason for that difference might be the presence of platelets and fibrinogen capable of forming a film on the surface of the tooth, which compromises the adhesion phenomenon.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 82%

Effect of saliva decontamination protocol on the adhesion to dentin with a universal adhesive

Chasqueira¹,

Luís²,

Portugal³

2019

j.rpemd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate the influence and effectiveness of the salivary decontamination protocol after polymerization of a universal adhesive on dentin adhesive strength, after 24 hours and 6 months of ageing. Methods: Fifty intact molars were sectioned in order to obtain two slices of dentin from each tooth. In all specimens except the control group (C-no contamination), after applying and light-curing the adhesive system (Scotchbond Universal), the adhesion surface was contaminated with human saliva, and was then subjected to a decontamination method that differed between groups (W-decontamination with water; W+A-decontamination with water and reapplication of adhesive; E-decontamination with ethanol; E+A-decontamination with ethanol and reapplication of adhesive). Shear bond strength was tested at 24 hours and 6 months of aging, until fracture, and the failure mode was observed. Data were statistically analyzed using non-parametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests (α=0.05). Results: At 24 hours of aging, the decontaminant (p=0.289) and the reapplication of the adhesive (p=0.072) did not influence the adhesive strength values, and all contaminated groups obtained significantly (p<0.05) lower adhesive strength values than the control group. At 6 months, the reapplication of the adhesive (W+A and E+A) provided increased adhesion values (p=0.001), but no differences were observed between the decontaminants (p=0.314). Only the W+A group yielded a statistically (p=0.376) similar value to the control group. Conclusion: When there is salivary contamination of the adhesion area after polymerization of the universal adhesive tested, water decontamination should be performed followed by a

show abstract

“…It would be beneficial for clinicians to perform simplified operation steps [3,4]. However, significant decrease in the adhesive strength on saliva-contaminated dentin surfaces was reported in 1-step self-etching adhesives [3,5,6].…”

Section: ⅰ Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…and Ulker et al . [6,7] suggested that washing and drying could restore the adhesive strength to primary dentin when salivary contamination occurs after photopolymerization. Fritz et al [8] reported the adhesive strength was not restored sufficiently by washing and drying when saliva contamination occurs after photopolymerization.…”

Section: ⅰ Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Saliva Decontamination on Bond Strength of 1-step Self-etching Adhesives to Dentin of Primary Posterior Teeth

Lee¹,

Kim²,

Jeong³

et al. 2019

THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to evaluate effect of saliva decontamination procedures on microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of 1-step self-etching adhesives to dentin of primary posterior teeth. 63 sound primary-posterior teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups according to different kinds of 1-step selfetching adhesives: Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive (SBU), All-Bond Universal ® (ABU), and Tetric ® N Bond Universal (TBU). Each group was randomly categorized into 7 subgroups: (I) application of adhesive without saliva contamination (control); (II-IV) contamination by saliva before photopolymerization; (V-VII) contamination by saliva after photopolymerization; (II, V) decontamination by drying; (III, VI) decontamination by washing and drying; (IV, VII) decontamination by washing, drying, and reapplication of adhesive. All samples were cut into the blocks. At least 15 blocks were tested for each subgroup. For SBU and ABU, the MTBS values of subgroups (I, IV, VII) were significantly higher than those of subgroups (II, III, V, VI). For TBU, the MTBS values of subgroups (I, IV) was significantly higher than those of subgroup (II, III, V, VI). The MTBS of 3 adhesives was reduced by saliva contamination. The adhesive strength on dentin of primary posterior teeth was restored by reapplication of the adhesives after washing and drying.

show abstract

The effect of saliva decontamination procedures on dentin bond strength after universal adhesive curing

Cited by 14 publications

References 30 publications

Effect of Saliva Contamination Stage and Different Decontamination Procedures on Bonding Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer

Effect of Saliva Contamination Stage and Different Decontamination Procedures on Bonding Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer

Effect of saliva decontamination protocol on the adhesion to dentin with a universal adhesive

Effect of Saliva Decontamination on Bond Strength of 1-step Self-etching Adhesives to Dentin of Primary Posterior Teeth

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About